Hi all,

I'm having a look at ORM libraries in D right now. So far, I've come across hibernated and dvorm.

Are there any other libraries that I should have a look at, particularly actively maintained ones? dvorm and hibernated seem to have received no work during the last couple of months.

 — David

On 25/09/15 1:18 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having a look at ORM libraries in D right now. So far, I've come
> across hibernated and dvorm.
>
> Are there any other libraries that I should have a look at, particularly
> actively maintained ones? dvorm and hibernated seem to have received no
> work during the last couple of months.
>
>   — David

Dvorm is more or less feature complete :)
I am the author of it, but unless issues come up I do not intend to continue working upon it.

I have another one being worked upon but think 2 year plan. There are many more important libraries to fill my time with, unfortunately.

On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 13:24:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> Dvorm is more or less feature complete :)
> I am the author of it, but unless issues come up I do not intend to continue working upon it.

You could consider bumping it up to version 1.0.0 to highlight this.

On 25/09/15 1:30 AM, Edwin van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 13:24:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>> Dvorm is more or less feature complete :)
>> I am the author of it, but unless issues come up I do not intend to
>> continue working upon it.
>
> You could consider bumping it up to version 1.0.0 to highlight this.

Put it this way, doing so would also bump it up on code.dlang.org.
I have not even ran the unittests in like a year. So who knows if it compiles with 2.068. But nobody has complained so lets assume yes.

On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 13:24:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> Dvorm is more or less feature complete :)
> I am the author of it, but unless issues come up I do not intend to continue working upon it.

Do you know whether somebody has written an SQLite provide for it? I was going to use SQLite initially, hoping to just switch to MySQL/PostgreSQL later in case I unexpectedly need more than that later.

 — David

On 25/09/15 1:43 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 13:24:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>> Dvorm is more or less feature complete :)
>> I am the author of it, but unless issues come up I do not intend to
>> continue working upon it.
>
> Do you know whether somebody has written an SQLite provide for it? I was
> going to use SQLite initially, hoping to just switch to MySQL/PostgreSQL
> later in case I unexpectedly need more than that later.
>
>   — David

As far as I am aware no.
Although I would recommend against taking it up unless you feel like taking ownership of it(Dvorm).

On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 13:18:58 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having a look at ORM libraries in D right now. So far, I've come across hibernated and dvorm.
>
> Are there any other libraries that I should have a look at, particularly actively maintained ones? dvorm and hibernated seem to have received no work during the last couple of months.
>
>  — David

You can checkout dotter [1]. Also in this thread [2] Sebastiaan mentioned that he used at his work a custom built ORM solution. You can probably ask him for more details.

[1]: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dotter
[2]: http://forum.dlang.org/post/eixkzndqlqxxyjejbajy@forum.dlang.org

On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 13:33:51 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> On 25/09/15 1:30 AM, Edwin van Leeuwen wrote:
>> On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 13:24:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>>> Dvorm is more or less feature complete :)
>>> I am the author of it, but unless issues come up I do not intend to
>>> continue working upon it.
>>
>> You could consider bumping it up to version 1.0.0 to highlight this.
>
> Put it this way, doing so would also bump it up on code.dlang.org.
> I have not even ran the unittests in like a year. So who knows if it compiles with 2.068. But nobody has complained so lets assume yes.

TravisCI ?

On 26/09/15 3:03 AM, John Colvin wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 13:33:51 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>> On 25/09/15 1:30 AM, Edwin van Leeuwen wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 13:24:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>>>> Dvorm is more or less feature complete :)
>>>> I am the author of it, but unless issues come up I do not intend to
>>>> continue working upon it.
>>>
>>> You could consider bumping it up to version 1.0.0 to highlight this.
>>
>> Put it this way, doing so would also bump it up on code.dlang.org.
>> I have not even ran the unittests in like a year. So who knows if it
>> compiles with 2.068. But nobody has complained so lets assume yes.
>
> TravisCI ?

I would still want to rerun them for e.g. MongoDB provider. Who know's what has changed in vibe.d since.