It has been suspended for a long time. Any plan?

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:47 PM, domain <do.main@163.com> wrote:

> It has been suspended for a long time. Any plan?
>

I have been working on it in my spare time. I have fixed some basic API issues that were outlined during the review process but not enough to put it through another review process.

std.log was originally implemented in a forked phobos repository but I has since create a separate repository so that it could be used even if it is not part of std/phobos.

One of the main concerns with std.log is that it has to two different APIs for regular logging: fatal(), error(), info(), etc. and verbose logging: vlog(). I have played around with a different API that would merge the two. The old API is inspired by glog the new non-existing API is inspired by Rust logging. I just need to spend a couple of days to completely flush out the new API and run it by the community.

Thanks,
-Jose

This is great news. Really looking forward to a std.log module.

/Jonas

On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 18:32:06 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
> This is great news. Really looking forward to a std.log module.
>
+1
> /Jonas

On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 18:05:08 UTC, José Armando García Sancio wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:47 PM, domain <do.main@163.com> wrote:
>
>> It has been suspended for a long time. Any plan?
>>
>
> I have been working on it in my spare time. I have fixed some basic API
> issues that were outlined during the review process but not enough to put
> it through another review process.
>
> std.log was originally implemented in a forked phobos repository but I has
> since create a separate repository so that it could be used even if it is
> not part of std/phobos.
>
> One of the main concerns with std.log is that it has to two different APIs
> for regular logging: fatal(), error(), info(), etc. and verbose logging:
> vlog(). I have played around with a different API that would merge the two.
> The old API is inspired by glog the new non-existing API is inspired by
> Rust logging. I just need to spend a couple of days to completely flush out
> the new API and run it by the community.
>
> Thanks,
> -Jose

Hi Jose,

How are you getting on with the std.log module?
Would be great to have one to use.

Colin

20.02.2013 17:45, Colin Grogan пишет:
> On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 18:05:08 UTC, José Armando García Sancio
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:47 PM, domain <do.main@163.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It has been suspended for a long time. Any plan?
>>>
>>
>> I have been working on it in my spare time. I have fixed some basic API
>> issues that were outlined during the review process but not enough to put
>> it through another review process.
>>
>> std.log was originally implemented in a forked phobos repository but I
>> has
>> since create a separate repository so that it could be used even if it is
>> not part of std/phobos.
>>
>> One of the main concerns with std.log is that it has to two different
>> APIs
>> for regular logging: fatal(), error(), info(), etc. and verbose logging:
>> vlog(). I have played around with a different API that would merge the
>> two.
>> The old API is inspired by glog the new non-existing API is inspired by
>> Rust logging. I just need to spend a couple of days to completely
>> flush out
>> the new API and run it by the community.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Jose
>
> Hi Jose,
>
> How are you getting on with the std.log module?
> Would be great to have one to use.
>
> Colin
>
Yes, it would be great really

>> Hi Jose,
>>
>> How are you getting on with the std.log module?
>> Would be great to have one to use.
>>
>> Colin
>>
> Yes, it would be great really

This is sorely needed else every third-party library will force its logging module upon users.

On 07.10.2012 21:20, nazriel wrote:
> On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 18:32:06 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
>> This is great news. Really looking forward to a std.log module.
>>
> +1
>> /Jonas
>

Yes. pls

+1

I have to say, its capabilities looks pretty awesome!
I would actually be happy to help somehow, but you sound as if you know pretty much what to do and that you simply lack the time so far.
Let me know if there is anything I or someone else can do to accelerate the process. I don't know whether you want to deal with pull requests right now...

Stephan




On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 18:05:08 UTC, José Armando García Sancio wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:47 PM, domain <do.main@163.com> wrote:
>
>> It has been suspended for a long time. Any plan?
>>
>
> I have been working on it in my spare time. I have fixed some basic API
> issues that were outlined during the review process but not enough to put
> it through another review process.
>
> std.log was originally implemented in a forked phobos repository but I has
> since create a separate repository so that it could be used even if it is
> not part of std/phobos.
>
> One of the main concerns with std.log is that it has to two different APIs
> for regular logging: fatal(), error(), info(), etc. and verbose logging:
> vlog(). I have played around with a different API that would merge the two.
> The old API is inspired by glog the new non-existing API is inspired by
> Rust logging. I just need to spend a couple of days to completely flush out
> the new API and run it by the community.
>
> Thanks,
> -Jose