January 17, 2011
For function parameters where the "scope" keyword doesn't matter (e.g. intrinsic types, many classes, structs, etc.), does "in" produce different code from "const"?
January 17, 2011
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:25:38 -0500, Sean Eskapp <eatingstaples@gmail.com> wrote:

> For function parameters where the "scope" keyword doesn't matter (e.g.
> intrinsic types, many classes, structs, etc.), does "in" produce different
> code from "const"?

No.

-Steve