Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
October 08, 2017 New release v0.5 of the D bindings for SAP NetWeaver RFC SDK | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hi! I made a new release of sapnwrfc-d, the D bindings for the SAP NetWeaver RFC SDK. Included are the following changes: - New bindings for basic decimal arithmetic (sapdecf.h) - A lot of fixes to the bindings and new, automatically generated bindings - New example applications computeday: This is an example of a simple RFC call repotool: This utility displays the metadata for a RFC The included set of example applications show how easy it is to call an RFC. To use the library just add a dependency to your dub.json/dub.sdl file or clone the source at https://github.com/redstar/sapnwrfc-d. Regards, Kai |
October 10, 2017 Re: New release v0.5 of the D bindings for SAP NetWeaver RFC SDK | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kai Nacke | On 10/08/2017 12:59 PM, Kai Nacke wrote: > The included set of example applications show how easy it is to call an RFC. To use the library just add a dependency to your dub.json/dub.sdl file or clone the source at https://github.com/redstar/sapnwrfc-d. Thanks, examples are nice for packages. Wondering a little about the std. usage, as it seems very unlikely to ever become standardized. Why not just use sap. or netweaver. as top level package? Also I can recommend at least some basic ddoc comments, it's really trivial to use ddox to get some nice documentation, e.g. see https://github.com/MartinNowak/bloom. If you use x:ddoxFilterArgs without "--only-documented", it should even work for undocumented functions. -Martin |
October 17, 2017 Re: New release v0.5 of the D bindings for SAP NetWeaver RFC SDK | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Martin Nowak | Hi Martin! On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 13:25:43 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: > Thanks, examples are nice for packages. Examples are a good way to check that the definitions are really working. My first version was really buggy. > Wondering a little about the std. usage, as it seems very unlikely to > ever become standardized. > Why not just use sap. or netweaver. as top level package? It was just of a lack of a better name. Thinking about it I like the "netweaver." package name. > Also I can recommend at least some basic ddoc comments, it's really trivial to use ddox to get some nice documentation, e.g. see https://github.com/MartinNowak/bloom. > > If you use x:ddoxFilterArgs without "--only-documented", it should even work for undocumented functions. Yeah, documentation is a bit weak. Currently, there is not much more than the official C API (for which you can download the documentation) with some D tuning. But I now start adding more functions and I will consider your hint. Thanks for your feedback! Regards, Kai |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation