April 23, 2021

On Friday, 23 April 2021 at 00:56:57 UTC, jmh530 wrote:

>

On Thursday, 22 April 2021 at 23:10:36 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:

>

[snip]

Why do people keep bringing up libclang here? I am not referring to libclang nor dpp as it does more than c here.
-Alex

You brought up Zig. How do you think Zig parses C? Answer: libclang.

I am more concerns with the ends results rather than the means to achieve said results.

-Alex

April 23, 2021

On Friday, 23 April 2021 at 01:54:25 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:

>

On Friday, 23 April 2021 at 00:56:57 UTC, jmh530 wrote:

>

You brought up Zig. How do you think Zig parses C? Answer: libclang.

I am more concerns with the ends results rather than the means to achieve said results.

-Alex

But the means is a very important aspect in terms of maintenance cost. What you're proposing is a maintenance nightmare.

1 2
Next ›   Last »