Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 15, 2020 WebAssembly as a platform for abstraction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Came across this interesting article recently about how WASM can be used to make it easy for users to add their own application logic: http://adventures.michaelfbryan.com/posts/wasm-as-a-platform-for-abstraction/ ... and hard not to think in this context of John Colvin's prescient remarks about the importance of WebAssembly from way back in 2015: https://forum.dlang.org/post/tnzujgocuuvmkdqdsjmm@forum.dlang.org It's arguably a bit late by now to be "catching a wave", but what's the current state of the art in D's WebAsssembly support? And does anyone have any experience of using it as a way to offer extensibility to end users? |
May 15, 2020 Re: WebAssembly as a platform for abstraction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Joseph Rushton Wakeling | On Friday, 15 May 2020 at 10:05:02 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > Came across this interesting article recently about how WASM can be used to make it easy for users to add their own application logic: > http://adventures.michaelfbryan.com/posts/wasm-as-a-platform-for-abstraction/ > > ... and hard not to think in this context of John Colvin's prescient remarks about the importance of WebAssembly from way back in 2015: > https://forum.dlang.org/post/tnzujgocuuvmkdqdsjmm@forum.dlang.org > > It's arguably a bit late by now to be "catching a wave", but what's the current state of the art in D's WebAsssembly support? And does anyone have any experience of using it as a way to offer extensibility to end users? I don't think it is too late at all. I have had some set-backs w.r.t. porting d-runtime, but there is nothing technical prevent completion. I have D running on cloudflare's edge network. They start up the module on each request (in less than 1 ms), beating any container/lambda thing I have seen. You can easily creating bindings to wasm3, or wasmer, or wasmtime, or any of the others, and host wasm code. Or use them to run your D code on a large variety of platforms, see https://github.com/wasm3/wasm3#status for a small list. The cool part is that other people are figuring out compatibility between all the languages that compile to wasm, and we just piggyback on that because of LDC. |
May 15, 2020 Re: WebAssembly as a platform for abstraction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sebastiaan Koppe | Case in point https://www.infoq.com/news/2020/05/webassembly-summit-containerless/ |
May 18, 2020 Re: WebAssembly as a platform for abstraction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sebastiaan Koppe | On Friday, 15 May 2020 at 10:25:21 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
> I don't think it is too late at all. I have had some set-backs w.r.t. porting d-runtime, but there is nothing technical prevent completion.
A few years back I though it would be cool if one could compile D to Java or .Net bytecode, so D could be better used as replacement for the non-system programming languages. But now I think that this is even better, as if I've understood correctly, Webassembly is more modern bytecode than the other two I mentioned.
Holding thumbs up for DRuntime in Wasm for LDC 1.23!
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation