I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before. Please test this

---
if [ ! -d "iz" ]; then
    git clone https://www.github.com/BBasile/iz.git
fi

cd iz/scripts
sh compile.sh
cd ../

#fails to link
dmd samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d lib/iz.a -Iimport > ddemangle


#on the other hand, this works...
dub samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d <<< "q"

#or even this...
dmd samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d import/iz/strings.d import/iz/memory.d -Iimport
---

and tell me what do you think: regression or not ?

On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before. Please test this
>
> ---
> if [ ! -d "iz" ]; then
>     git clone https://www.github.com/BBasile/iz.git
> fi
>
> cd iz/scripts
> sh compile.sh
> cd ../
>
> #fails to link
> dmd samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d lib/iz.a -Iimport > ddemangle
>
>
> #on the other hand, this works...
> dub samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d <<< "q"
>
> #or even this...
> dmd samples/dictionnary_suffixarray.d import/iz/strings.d import/iz/memory.d -Iimport
> ---
>
> and tell me what do you think: regression or not ?

I guess a mangle problem ?

On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before.
> I guess a mangle problem ?

Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression.
i'm digging right now.

On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before.
>> I guess a mangle problem ?
>
> Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression.
> i'm digging right now.

digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1) is untestable.
digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect.
digger: The first bad commit could be any of:
digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec
digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1
digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69
object.Exception@bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more!

On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:51:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before.
>>> I guess a mangle problem ?
>>
>> Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression.
>> i'm digging right now.
>
> digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1) is untestable.
> digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect.
> digger: The first bad commit could be any of:
> digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec
> digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1
> digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69
> object.Exception@bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more!

please file a bug on d.puremagic.com/issues/

On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 21:52:30 UTC, timotheecour wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:51:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>>>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before.
>>>> I guess a mangle problem ?
>>>
>>> Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression.
>>> i'm digging right now.
>>
>> digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1) is untestable.
>> digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect.
>> digger: The first bad commit could be any of:
>> digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec
>> digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1
>> digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69
>> object.Exception@bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more!
>
> please file a bug on d.puremagic.com/issues/

Yeah i did.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18234

I saw a related (but not similar) thing yesterday. the guy has to pass a dummy.d file for linking to succeed.

On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 22:15:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 21:52:30 UTC, timotheecour wrote:
>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:51:31 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 18:50:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 17:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 14:13:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>>>>> I have a simple program that only compiles if the dependency is not pre-compiled as a static library. It worked fine before.
>>>>> I guess a mangle problem ?
>>>>
>>>> Yes and quite old...apparently it's more a 2.074.x regression.
>>>> i'm digging right now.
>>>
>>> digger: Commit 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec (1/1) is untestable.
>>> digger: There are only untestable commits left to bisect.
>>> digger: The first bad commit could be any of:
>>> digger: 1e7b526b40852e9b85df3684430e371034cdf7ec
>>> digger: 6fecaa8232a427fb3ca29c5a5245e08fc43b71b1
>>> digger: f0410bea1ad2b130884964d603b34e729b3e4f69
>>> object.Exception@bisect.d(186): We cannot bisect more!
>>
>> please file a bug on d.puremagic.com/issues/
>
> Yeah i did.
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18234
>
> I saw a related (but not similar) thing yesterday. the guy has to pass a dummy.d file for linking to succeed.

Ah it was you actually:

https://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.2616.1516919399.9493.digitalmars-d-bugs@puremagic.com