March 24, 2015 Re: Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 18:48:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> I'm fed up with this problem. It is actively hurting us every day.
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14307
>
> Anyone want to take this on? Shouldn't be particularly difficult.
I could take this task, with help of Brian's scanner I could easily find that methods to document...
Let me know should I take it or not.
|
March 24, 2015 Re: Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dejan Lekic | On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 14:17:26 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 18:48:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> I'm fed up with this problem. It is actively hurting us every day.
>>
>> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14307
>>
>> Anyone want to take this on? Shouldn't be particularly difficult.
>
> I could take this task, with help of Brian's scanner I could easily find that methods to document...
>
> Let me know should I take it or not.
Actually, I just realised what the issue is... :) I apologise. I thought the task is to document those functions that are not yet documented.
Why would you want DDoc to issue those errors? I would rather setup a git hook which is using Brian's dfmt, or implement something similar to Checkstyle in Java world, and use it in git hook to prevent undocumented functions creeping into the D code...
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation