On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 at 20:04:08 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 at 16:32:38 UTC, bearophile_hugs@eml.cc wrote:
>> And to represent those indexes I used a
>> sbyte instead of a ubyte because I have used -1 to represent "missing value").
>
> You still have to use 0xFF :-). But yes, I understand, that sbyte and ubyte is better way, how to solve this issue.

s/have to/can/