It looks like there is a workaround by adding PT_OPENBSD_NOBTCFI segment header. https://man.openbsd.org/ld.bfd.1

Have you tried that?

On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 11:39:39 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> It looks like there is a workaround by adding PT_OPENBSD_NOBTCFI segment header. https://man.openbsd.org/ld.bfd.1
>
> Have you tried that?

You know I'm an OpenBSD developer, right? We are not accepting this for compilers.

No, I am not aware of what projects people work upon unless I've helped them with it typically.

But yes, sorry for not seeing the from email address and making noise that wasn't helpful for continuing D support.

On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 12:06:37 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> No, I am not aware of what projects people work upon unless I've helped them with it typically.
>
> But yes, sorry for not seeing the from email address and making noise that wasn't helpful for continuing D support.

All good. I'm just asking about the status of IBT/BTI instructions being emitted by DMD and LDC. That's all.

On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 12:06:37 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> No, I am not aware of what projects people work upon unless I've helped them with it typically.
>
> But yes, sorry for not seeing the from email address and making noise that wasn't helpful for continuing D support.

If you're in the webforum, there's no way to see the From header anyways, afaict.

On 11/07/2023 12:16 AM, Brian Callahan wrote:
> All good. I'm just asking about the status of IBT/BTI instructions being emitted by DMD and LDC. That's all.

I should give you some feedback however.

When I looked up the appropriate keywords, all I got from Google was all but one completely useless links. The one useful one is by Intel targeting people who are already pretty deep into attack mitigation.

If this is anything to go by, there are no migration guidelines. So not very likely its going to have an implementation by anyone ;)