Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
October 11, 2013 possible codegen issue for ubyte params? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/77b60e32 I must start by apologizing for the bad test program, since it's not fully minimal and requires 2 external binary files in order to reproduce. But any files seems to suffice, my test files are 8k and the needle-file is not contained in the haystack-file. // object.Error: Access Violation algorithm.d(3609): for (auto i = needle.save; !i.empty && !binaryFun!pred(i.back, needleBack); DMD32 D Compiler v2.063.2 // This works fine bool binaryFun_i(uint a, uint b) { return a==b; } // object.Error: Access Violation bool binaryFun_b(ubyte a, ubyte b) { return a==b; } Also if compiling with -inline, the problem disappears, this is what gave me the "wild codegen theory". Basically I'm wondering if this is this a known issue, or if my program invalid? |
October 11, 2013 Re: possible codegen issue for ubyte params? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stefan Jonasson | Am 11.10.2013 18:23, schrieb Stefan Jonasson:
> http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/77b60e32
>
> I must start by apologizing for the bad test program, since it's not
> fully minimal and requires 2 external binary files in order to
> reproduce. But any files seems to suffice, my test files are 8k and the
> needle-file is not contained in the haystack-file.
>
> // object.Error: Access Violation
> algorithm.d(3609):
> for (auto i = needle.save; !i.empty && !binaryFun!pred(i.back, needleBack);
>
> DMD32 D Compiler v2.063.2
>
> // This works fine
> bool binaryFun_i(uint a, uint b) { return a==b; }
>
> // object.Error: Access Violation
> bool binaryFun_b(ubyte a, ubyte b) { return a==b; }
>
> Also if compiling with -inline, the problem disappears, this is what
> gave me the "wild codegen theory". Basically I'm wondering if this is
> this a known issue, or if my program invalid?
Does this always happen or only when you specifiy -O?
Because I think I have a codegen bug too which only appears when compiling with -O. It also involves a ubyte parameter.
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
|
October 11, 2013 Re: possible codegen issue for ubyte params? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Benjamin Thaut | On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 18:42:42 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
>
> Does this always happen or only when you specifiy -O?
> Because I think I have a codegen bug too which only appears when compiling with -O. It also involves a ubyte parameter.
>
> Kind Regards
> Benjamin Thaut
That's very interesting, thank you for the information!
It always happens, regardless if '-O' is used or not.
Best Regards,
Stefan J
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation