Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
July 12, 2012 Stopping a StopWatch that's not started | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
This may not qualify as a bug though it's not helpful. If you stop a StopWatch from std.datetime that's not been started it gets set to a garbage time value rather than remaining at 0. This seems like inconsistent behaviour as stopping a started stopwatch retains the time value that it had when it was stopped. A linked enhancement request would be that it would be nice to have a dedicated 'isStarted' boolean member function to check if a StopWatch is running or not rather than checking that time has passed. |
July 12, 2012 Re: Stopping a StopWatch that's not started | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ixid | On Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 19:52:13 UTC, ixid wrote: > This may not qualify as a bug though it's not helpful. If you stop a StopWatch from std.datetime that's not been started it gets set to a garbage time value rather than remaining at 0. This seems like inconsistent behaviour as stopping a started stopwatch retains the time value that it had when it was stopped. A linked enhancement request would be that it would be nice to have a dedicated 'isStarted' boolean member function to check if a StopWatch is running or not rather than checking that time has passed. This group is strictly meant for providing a feed of bug tracker activity, and is generally not monitored (posting should really be restricted). Please file any bug reports or enhancement requests directly to the Bugzilla instance at http://d.puremagic.com/issues/. David |
July 12, 2012 Re: Stopping a StopWatch that's not started | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Nadlinger | Ah, sorry. Wasn't aware of that. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation