On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 15:41:03 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
> On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 15:33:45 UTC, JJDuck wrote:

>
> vibe.d is root an open-source project ? on about page is wrote is
> licensed under MIT which are an open source license.
>
> quote from http://vibed.org/about
> "vibe.d is licensed under the terms of the MIT public license"

For the next 5-10 years, will it stay like that? it will be great if it will be...I'm just a bit concerned...

On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 14:05:48 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
> On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 10:48:09 UTC, JJDuck wrote:
>
> Vibe.d has support for ssl streams. You should be able to send and receive raw structs over such a stream, or if the server and client have a different arch you can use vibe's bson serialisation.
>
> http://vibed.org/api/vibe.stream.ssl/

I definitely will research on that. It is indeed a good alternatives.

Thanks

On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 15:44:13 UTC, JJDuck wrote:
> On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 14:05:48 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
>> On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 10:48:09 UTC, JJDuck wrote:
>>
>> Vibe.d has support for ssl streams. You should be able to send and receive raw structs over such a stream, or if the server and client have a different arch you can use vibe's bson serialisation.
>>
>> http://vibed.org/api/vibe.stream.ssl/
>
> I definitely will research on that. It is indeed a good alternatives.
>
> Thanks

If they change their license. you will not be able to update but
you should to  stay with previous license which was release under a free
license.
So if they change their license a fork will appear from the last
version released under an open license.

I tried to compile it with dmd and there are some problem with D1 code, so I will try to port it to D2. I will post the result if I can successfully port it.

On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 15:42:56 UTC, JJDuck wrote:
> On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 15:41:03 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
>> On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 15:33:45 UTC, JJDuck wrote:
>
>>
>> vibe.d is root an open-source project ? on about page is wrote is
>> licensed under MIT which are an open source license.
>>
>> quote from http://vibed.org/about
>> "vibe.d is licensed under the terms of the MIT public license"
>
> For the next 5-10 years, will it stay like that? it will be great if it will be...I'm just a bit concerned...

I can't imagine Sonke ever wanting to change license of vibe.d to something more restrictive.