July 22, 2022

On 7/22/22 3:22 PM, Azi Hassan wrote:

>

Oh, interesting syntax. I was thinking something along the lines of

template printEnum(...) {
     version(debug) {
         ... // everything we already did
     } else {
         enum printEnum(alias x) = x;
     }
}

But I like yours better.

version(debug) isn't valid syntax, debug is a keyword.

-Steve

July 23, 2022

On Saturday, 23 July 2022 at 00:56:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

>

On 7/22/22 3:22 PM, Azi Hassan wrote:

>

Oh, interesting syntax. I was thinking something along the lines of

template printEnum(...) {
     version(debug) {
         ... // everything we already did
     } else {
         enum printEnum(alias x) = x;
     }
}

But I like yours better.

version(debug) isn't valid syntax, debug is a keyword.

-Steve

I stand corrected, I must've got it confused with version(unittest)

July 25, 2022

On 7/23/22 2:27 PM, Azi Hassan wrote:

>

On Saturday, 23 July 2022 at 00:56:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

>

On 7/22/22 3:22 PM, Azi Hassan wrote:

>

Oh, interesting syntax. I was thinking something along the lines of

template printEnum(...) {
     version(debug) {
         ... // everything we already did
     } else {
         enum printEnum(alias x) = x;
     }
}

But I like yours better.

version(debug) isn't valid syntax, debug is a keyword.

I stand corrected, I must've got it confused with version(unittest)

And I stand corrected! unittest is also a keyword, so clearly that's not disqualifying. Indeed, the grammar specifically includes version(unittest) and version(assert).

However, because debug is exactly like version in how it operates, version(debug) would make little sense.

-Steve

1 2
Next ›   Last »