Though they don't hold me up, I don't see why the following haven't been dealt with:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4147
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=704
The latter to a lesser extent since it is not clear whether it is simply an invalid report.

I'd also like: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11788

On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 08:58:09 UTC, luminousone wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3332

I just wrote a comment in there... I'm not sure it is a bug (nor is it restricted to templates)

I'd just like to point out for everyone in this conversation that you can vote for issues in bugzilla. The vote tally is a much easier way for the people who work on the compiler to quantify what the community wants from D.

I don't know how much the major compiler devs use the votes for making decisions but at least it'd less ephemeral than these forum posts that will be gone and forgotten in a day or two.

Here's the issue list sorted by votes:

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&query_format=advanced&votes=1&order=votes

On 2/25/14, 12:12 AM, Manu wrote:
> On 25 February 2014 17:22, Walter Bright <newshound2@digitalmars.com
> <mailto:newshound2@digitalmars.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 2/24/2014 9:00 PM, Manu wrote:
>
>         1. Options to select CRT reference for DMD-Win64, and /Zl equiv
>         option to omit
>         any such reference.
>         2. **Debugging**; concerted focus to tighten the experience.
>         Classes, enums,
>         globals (and more) all don't work. Locals with the same name
>         appearing in
>         multiple sub-scope's within the same function confuse the
>         debugger. Control
>         statements (break, continue, etc) don't seem to emit line
>         numbers; single
>         stepping skips right over them.
>         3. ref doesn't accept rvalues. Can't declare ref locals
>         (pointers change semantics).
>
>         These above anything else are interfering with my work every day.
>
>
>     What are the bugzilla numbers for these?
>
>
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12163
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12127
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12125
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11961
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11902
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12244
>
> #3 remains an ongoing debate...

I should reiterate my request to add more bugzilla votes available to people (e.g. 10). I recall Don protested this the first time around, but a lot of things have improved since (and I didn't agree with his arguments in the first place).

Andrei

On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 23:28:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
> I should reiterate my request to add more bugzilla votes available to people (e.g. 10).
>

Current quota is 10.

I also recommend that a user be allowed to assign more than one vote per issue.  See "Maximum votes a person can put on a single bug" here (http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.2/en/html/voting.html)

I created an enhancement request here: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/post_bug.cgi.  Go ahead and vote for it!

I'm skeptical that votes actually influence action, but they do provide a nice metric for gauging impact, importance, and value to the community.

Mike

On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 01:32:43 UTC, Mike wrote:
> I created an enhancement request here: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/post_bug.cgi.

Damn! Here's the correct link: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12259

Mike

On 2/25/14, 5:32 PM, Mike wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 23:28:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>> I should reiterate my request to add more bugzilla votes available to
>> people (e.g. 10).
>>
>
> Current quota is 10.

Yah, I thought it's 5... anyhow it's insufficient as it is.

> I also recommend that a user be allowed to assign more than one vote per
> issue.  See "Maximum votes a person can put on a single bug" here
> (http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.2/en/html/voting.html)
>
> I created an enhancement request here:
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/post_bug.cgi.  Go ahead and vote for it!
>
> I'm skeptical that votes actually influence action, but they do provide
> a nice metric for gauging impact, importance, and value to the community.

It should inform our bountysource assignments.


Andrei

On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 12:35:18 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>>
>> What are yours?
>
> Every year again: rvalue references. :)

Looks like it's here (https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9238).  Only 2 votes, though.

On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 02:52:09 UTC, Mike wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 12:35:18 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>>>
>>> What are yours?
>>
>> Every year again: rvalue references. :)
>
> Looks like it's here (https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9238).  Only 2 votes, though.

We're discussing this stuff since years and I'm pretty sure that in exactly one year we will discuss this again. ;)

> What are yours?

Make it possible to defined implicit conversions between wrapped types in order to, for instance, correctly implement NotNull for reference types. See:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21588742/getting-notnull-right?noredirect=1#comment33399977_21588742