wxD(ead)?

Jun 17, 2013

Chris

Jun 17, 2013

David

Jun 17, 2013

Jun 17, 2013

Jun 17, 2013

Jun 17, 2013

Is wxD dead? I read an earlier thread that says that "As of 2013, the library is probably best considered discontinued ?" It would be a pity, although I completely understand that it is hard to keep such a project up.

Am 17.06.2013 12:45, schrieb Chris: > Is wxD dead? I read an earlier thread that says that "As of 2013, the library is probably best considered discontinued ?" It would be a pity, although I completely understand that it is hard to keep such a project up. Maybe teaming up with wxPython would be an idea? I know that they use SWIG to generate their Python 2 bindings, how it's done with the "new" Project Phoenix, I am not sure, but I think it is still SWIG.

On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 14:32 +0200, David wrote: > Am 17.06.2013 12:45, schrieb Chris: > > Is wxD dead? I read an earlier thread that says that "As of 2013, the library is probably best considered discontinued ?" It would be a pity, although I completely understand that it is hard to keep such a project up. > > Maybe teaming up with wxPython would be an idea? I know that they use SWIG to generate their Python 2 bindings, how it's done with the "new" Project Phoenix, I am not sure, but I think it is still SWIG. wxPython is effectively dead since it is Python 2 only. However there is Pheonix which is a Python 3 binding to wxWidgets. Sadly it's not yet in Debian so I haven't tried it. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder

Am 17.06.2013 19:47, schrieb Russel Winder: > On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 14:32 +0200, David wrote: >> Am 17.06.2013 12:45, schrieb Chris: >>> Is wxD dead? I read an earlier thread that says that "As of 2013, the library is probably best considered discontinued ?" It would be a pity, although I completely understand that it is hard to keep such a project up. >> >> Maybe teaming up with wxPython would be an idea? I know that they use SWIG to generate their Python 2 bindings, how it's done with the "new" Project Phoenix, I am not sure, but I think it is still SWIG. > > wxPython is effectively dead since it is Python 2 only. However there is Pheonix which is a Python 3 binding to wxWidgets. Sadly it's not yet in Debian so I haven't tried it. > Well you're misinformed here, wxPython 2, is still developed, development never stopped and Phoenix exists for a long time now.

On Monday, 17 June 2013 at 20:04:34 UTC, David wrote: > Am 17.06.2013 19:47, schrieb Russel Winder: >> On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 14:32 +0200, David wrote: >>> >>> Maybe teaming up with wxPython would be an idea? I know that they use >>> SWIG to generate their Python 2 bindings, how it's done with the "new" >>> Project Phoenix, I am not sure, but I think it is still SWIG. >> >> wxPython is effectively dead since it is Python 2 only. However there is >> Pheonix which is a Python 3 binding to wxWidgets. Sadly it's not yet in >> Debian so I haven't tried it. >> > > Well you're misinformed here, wxPython 2, is still developed, > development never stopped and Phoenix exists for a long time now. I believe he meant wxPython 2.x for Python 3.