| Thread overview | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
December 09 opend data structures | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | I shipped some data structure code over on openD, but not all template wizards may be keeping track of the fork. https://github.com/opendlang/d/blob/main/source/odc/datastructures.d I think this is the type of thing that benefits from lots of iteration, needs some battle testing, needs editing passes by other poeple, etc. criticize | |||
December 10 Re: opend data structures | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to monkyyy | On Monday, 9 December 2024 at 02:03:57 UTC, monkyyy wrote: >I shipped some data structure code over on openD, but not all template wizards may be keeping track of the fork. https://github.com/opendlang/d/blob/main/source/odc/datastructures.d I think this is the type of thing that benefits from lots of iteration, needs some battle testing, needs editing passes by other poeple, etc. criticize I can not follow openD because D gives me a lot of confidence. Since it has not yet been able to prove its age, I am excluding it from the evaluation. SDB@79 | |||
December 11 Re: opend data structures | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to monkyyy | On Monday, 9 December 2024 at 02:03:57 UTC, monkyyy wrote: >I shipped some data structure code over on openD, but not all template wizards may be keeping track of the fork. https://github.com/opendlang/d/blob/main/source/odc/datastructures.d I think this is the type of thing that benefits from lots of iteration, needs some battle testing, needs editing passes by other poeple, etc. criticize Yeah looks kinda weird to advertise openD work on the upstream website >array2d, array3d Isn't there a consensus that it's called Vector? | |||
December 11 Re: opend data structures | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Anton Pastukhov | On Wednesday, 11 December 2024 at 08:25:14 UTC, Anton Pastukhov wrote: > >array2d, array3d Isn't there a consensus that it's called Vector? c++ lacks any taste in api, its opinion should be held in negative value | |||
December 12 Re: opend data structures | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to monkyyy | On Wednesday, 11 December 2024 at 15:39:35 UTC, monkyyy wrote: >On Wednesday, 11 December 2024 at 08:25:14 UTC, Anton Pastukhov wrote: > >array2d, array3d Isn't there a consensus that it's called Vector? c++ lacks any taste in api, its opinion should be held in negative value those poor mathematicians, they've been brainwashed by c++ folks | |||
December 14 Re: opend data structures | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to evilrat | On 12/12/24 10:02, evilrat wrote:
> On Wednesday, 11 December 2024 at 15:39:35 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 11 December 2024 at 08:25:14 UTC, Anton Pastukhov wrote:
>>>> array2d, array3d
>>>
>>> Isn't there a consensus that it's called Vector?
>>
>> c++ lacks any taste in api, its opinion should be held in negative value
>
> those poor mathematicians, they've been brainwashed by c++ folks
Pretty much. A `vector` ordinarily refers to an element of a vector space. I think resisting this terminology is valid, particularly as a mathematician.
Calling general arrays vectors is about as silly as calling general functions vectors, it's just that one of these has kind of caught on. I still think it is more weird to criticize an array API for _not_ using "vector" than for using "vector".
| |||
Permalink
Reply
