| |
 | Posted by H. S. Teoh in reply to monkyyy | Permalink Reply |
|
H. S. Teoh 
Posted in reply to monkyyy
| On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 08:48:45PM +0000, monkyyy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> https://webassembly.org/news/2025-09-17-wasm-3.0/
>
> I hate this timeline, I hate web pages as apps, I hate the security theater combined with "lol you need to let this Russian porn ad to execute code on your machine so we get .00000001 of a cent, it ILLEGAL to stop this"
What? What makes it "illegal" to stop it? Just block JS (and by extension wasm) by default and enable only on sites you trust. I don't allow JS by default, and on most sites I only let it run for the duration I'm on the site. Only trusted sites get to run JS in my browser. Untrusted JS sources get a permanent JS ban no matter what site I'm on.
Yes this makes most sites appear "broken", but I ignore most JS-dependent sites anyway (they rarely have anything interesting to offer, the JS is usually for eye-candy only, or paywalls, adware, or malware -- if they don't have non-JS HTML with actual content, they're rarely worth my attention). Unless it's a trusted site or the JS actually offers something beyond just eye-candy / adware / other useless fluff.
T
--
Answer: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. / Question: Why is top posting bad?
|