February 12, 2014 Re: Review Candidates awaited! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sönke Ludwig | On Wednesday, 12 February 2014 at 22:30:14 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Don't want to start this discussion again, but there is a possibility to kill two birds with one stone here by naming it std.data.xml instead. The same would later go for std.data.json. Any future formats (as well as std.csv) could then also go to the std.data package and not clutter up the top level package further.
That is clean. Being able to organize several formats into a single location. Also follows the pattern set by the digest.* modules.
Joseph
|
February 15, 2014 Re: Review Candidates awaited! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dicebot | On Saturday, 1 February 2014 at 19:52:59 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Looking at http://wiki.dlang.org/Review_Queue there are 4 proposals that are marked as "Ready for review" or "Ready for comments". I can proceed with any of those any time proposal author sends me an e-mail acknowledging his attention.
>
> Walter Bright, Idan Arye, Paul D. Anderson, Michael Rynn - I am speaking about you ;)
>
> Also if there is something ready but not in queue - don't hesitate about it.
Paul Andersons's decimal library looks very promising, but isn't usable in its current github version. I think it's more of a 'work in progress' and I hope that its development will be resumed.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation