On Sunday, 11 August 2024 at 06:04:08 UTC, mw wrote:
>On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 14:09:10 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>Tobias Pankrath:
>Works as designed: http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#.remove
Unfortunately it's one of the worst designed functions of Phobos:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10959
Bye,
bearophile
Hit this one today,
Has removeAt
or removeAtIndex
be added to the std lib?
BTW, for associative array, remove()
is in-place; but here for std.algorithm.mutation.remove (keyword: mutation), one need to do
array = array.remove(index); // return a new container
// v.s.
aa.remove(key); // return bool (if it's removed)
This in-consistence is really bad.
You may want to create a new thread about this in General. If it's going to get changed, now is the time as they're working on updates to Phobos, but they're not going to see this post.