| |
|
drenoob 
| On Thursday, 12 June 2025 at 15:24:35 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> On 13/06/2025 2:36 AM, drenoob wrote:
>> So, I shouldn't trust libs that are in the offical dub repo? Strange and sad..
>
> The dub registry is no different than nuget's or npm's.
>
> Unless its shipped with the compiler it is naturally lower (if any) trust.
Well, I guess I learned that now. But then: *is* there a place where one can find stable/mature/maintained and/or trustworthy D libs?
OK, in my case falling for a, let me call it questionable, lib was desastrous because *of course* it makes a language look not exactly great when right at the get-go one walks into a "trap".
But I guess I'm not the only one who, to a major degree came to D because I wanted a *mature* tool (and "universe"), and probably quite many would value a place where one hadn't to play lottery but could find reasonably reliable libs.
Btw, are there any more or less agreed upon standards re (lib) docu here in the D-lang community? I'm asking because that (largely non existing lib docu) was one of the major reasons I gave up on another language with plenty "funny" experiments but precious little one could actually work with wrt docu (and rely upon).
Be that as it may, I thank you.
|