| |
| Posted by H. S. Teoh in reply to Chris Katko | PermalinkReply |
|
H. S. Teoh
Posted in reply to Chris Katko
| On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 11:29:17PM +0000, Chris Katko via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
> It seems I can (thanks to the amazing work of D community) simply do:
>
> ```d
> extern(C) int sched_yield(void); // #include <sched.h>
> ```
>
> however, how does the linker know I need <sched.h> and not some local library, or SDL library, or SDL2.0 library, etc. Shouldn't I be specifying the library somewhere?
An extern(C) function exists in the global namespace, namely, `sched_yield` will bind at link time to whatever library exports the symbol `sched_yield`. Most linkers (and linker configurations) will generate an error if there are multiple symbols with the same name defined. (The exception is when a symbol is marked as a "weak" symbol, but that's usually not done except for special purposes.)
This is why good libraries like SDL always prefixes their API functions with `SDL_`, for example. In order to prevent confusion of SDL functions with a function of the same name from another library.
[...]
> Side side question: The above line fails to compile as-is because it
> has (void) instead of ().
>
> ```
> source/app.d(226,16): Error: cannot have parameter of type `void`
> ```
>
> Should that be corrected in the compiler? Shouldn't () and (void) be
> interchangeable as long as you're not doing void*?
In C, `int func()` means `func` can take any number of arguments. That's
why you need to write `int func(void)` to explicitly say there are NO
parameters.
But in D, `int func()` means `func` takes no arguments. So you never
write `int func(void)`. D's `int func()` == C's `int func(void)`.
T
--
There are four kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics.
|