Wasn’t 2.110 due for August 1? Is there a reason it isn’t it published yet?
Thread overview | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
August 19 Why isn’t 2.110 published? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
August 30 Re: Why isn’t 2.110 published? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Quirin Schroll | On Monday, 19 August 2024 at 12:59:34 UTC, Quirin Schroll wrote: >Wasn’t 2.110 due for August 1? Is there a reason it isn’t it published yet? I am quite surprised that such a simple and important question has gone without any response for such a long time I can't help but wonder what the future of the community will look like. |
August 30 Re: Why isn’t 2.110 published? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Dakota | On Friday, 30 August 2024 at 06:36:23 UTC, Dakota wrote: >On Monday, 19 August 2024 at 12:59:34 UTC, Quirin Schroll wrote: >Wasn’t 2.110 due for August 1? Is there a reason it isn’t it published yet? I am quite surprised that such a simple and important question has gone without any response for such a long time I can't help but wonder what the future of the community will look like. I already told that before.. I'm almost sure many people after reading this will have
When you accept this - peace and happiness will be with you :) So stop feeling frustrated and start enjoying life! |
August 30 Re: Why isn’t 2.110 published? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Quirin Schroll | On Monday, 19 August 2024 at 12:59:34 UTC, Quirin Schroll wrote: >Wasn’t 2.110 due for August 1? Is there a reason it isn’t it published yet? what's sad is people from D foundation all ignored this post they literally don't care about people using D it shows in the PRs that get merged, and it shows in releases being ignored |
August 30 Re: Why isn’t 2.110 published? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sergey | On Friday, 30 August 2024 at 06:46:54 UTC, Sergey wrote: >On Friday, 30 August 2024 at 06:36:23 UTC, Dakota wrote: >On Monday, 19 August 2024 at 12:59:34 UTC, Quirin Schroll wrote: >Wasn’t 2.110 due for August 1? Is there a reason it isn’t it published yet? I am quite surprised that such a simple and important question has gone without any response for such a long time I can't help but wonder what the future of the community will look like. I already told that before.. Relax people. Iain Buclaw handles the releases. Anytime there's a delay, there's a reason for it. |
August 30 Re: Why isn’t 2.110 published? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ryuukk_ | On Friday, 30 August 2024 at 07:03:11 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote: >they literally don't care about people using D Nothing could be further from the truth. We wouldn't be here otherwise. |
August 30 Re: Why isn’t 2.110 published? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Mike Parker | On Friday, 30 August 2024 at 07:04:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: >On Friday, 30 August 2024 at 06:46:54 UTC, Sergey wrote: >On Friday, 30 August 2024 at 06:36:23 UTC, Dakota wrote: >On Monday, 19 August 2024 at 12:59:34 UTC, Quirin Schroll wrote: >Wasn’t 2.110 due for August 1? Is there a reason it isn’t it published yet? I am quite surprised that such a simple and important question has gone without any response for such a long time I can't help but wonder what the future of the community will look like. I already told that before.. Relax people. Iain Buclaw handles the releases. Anytime there's a delay, there's a reason for it. Communication is key to avoid confusion and concerns, there is literally 0 communication, therefore there will be confusion and concerns |
October 24 Re: Why isn’t 2.110 published? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Quirin Schroll | On Monday, 19 August 2024 at 12:59:34 UTC, Quirin Schroll wrote: >Wasn’t 2.110 due for August 1? Is there a reason it isn’t it published yet? Almost 3 months delay, any comment from core team? |
October 24 Re: Why isn’t 2.110 published? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Mike Parker | On Friday, 30 August 2024 at 07:04:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: >Relax people. Iain Buclaw handles the releases. Anytime there's a delay, there's a reason for it. I don't think people have a problem with the concept of their being a reason for it. I think the problem is that there has been no communication, at least that I've seen on what that reason is. It could be as simple as "Iain had to step away for a while, but he'll be back in X time." IDK. 🤷♂️ The point being, we don't know why, and I think that would cool all of this down if we did. But the radio silence is disconcerting. And there is quite the pile of fixes and changes building up in the pending changelog. |
October 25 Re: Why isn’t 2.110 published? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Adam Wilson | On Thursday, 24 October 2024 at 06:24:56 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote: >On Friday, 30 August 2024 at 07:04:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: >Relax people. Iain Buclaw handles the releases. Anytime there's a delay, there's a reason for it. I don't think people have a problem with the concept of their being a reason for it. I think the problem is that there has been no communication, at least that I've seen on what that reason is. It could be as simple as "Iain had to step away for a while, but he'll be back in X time." IDK. 🤷♂️ The point being, we don't know why, and I think that would cool all of this down if we did. But the radio silence is disconcerting. And there is quite the pile of fixes and changes building up in the pending changelog. Iain's activity on github has lowered substantially (is close to zero) since around july: (That would suggest that Iain is taking a break for a while; hope all is good, and the break was planned.) |