This release has a record set of almost 90 additions and fixes. Some of them are:

 - Compiles on DMD 2.064 (as well as DMD 2.063.2)
 - Reworked the WebSocket implementation to not require a particular
   send/receive order to function properly
 - Stability and memory consumption of the HTTP client, as well as
   parts of the HTTP server hav been greatly improved
 - The render!() function to render Diet templates is considered stable
   beginning with DMD 2.064, so the more cumbersome renderCompat!() is
   no longer required
 - Improved serialization system with allocation-less JSON
   (de-)serialization among other things

The full list of changes/fixes can be found at http://vibed.org/blog/posts/vibe-release-0.7.18

Homepage: http://vibed.org/
DUB package: http://code.dlang.org/packages/vibe-d
GitHub: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d

On 2013-11-26 20:31, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> This release has a record set of almost 90 additions and fixes. Some of
> them are:

Cool.

>   - Compiles on DMD 2.064 (as well as DMD 2.063.2)

2.064.2 or 2.064?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

Am 26.11.2013 20:43, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
> On 2013-11-26 20:31, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> This release has a record set of almost 90 additions and fixes. Some of them are:
> 
> Cool.
> 
>>   - Compiles on DMD 2.064 (as well as DMD 2.063.2)
> 
> 2.064.2 or 2.064?
> 

2.064.2 of course, was confused a bit about 2.064.x being RCs instead of full releases ;)

On 2013-11-26 20:49, Sönke Ludwig wrote:

> 2.064.2 of course, was confused a bit about 2.064.x being RCs instead of
> full releases ;)

And it doesn't get any better when running "dmd" prints "2.064" :(

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 at 19:31:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> This release has a record set of almost 90 additions and fixes. Some of
> them are:
>
>  - Compiles on DMD 2.064 (as well as DMD 2.063.2)
>  - Reworked the WebSocket implementation to not require a particular
>    send/receive order to function properly
>  - Stability and memory consumption of the HTTP client, as well as
>    parts of the HTTP server hav been greatly improved
>  - The render!() function to render Diet templates is considered stable
>    beginning with DMD 2.064, so the more cumbersome renderCompat!() is
>    no longer required
>  - Improved serialization system with allocation-less JSON
>    (de-)serialization among other things
>
> The full list of changes/fixes can be found at
> http://vibed.org/blog/posts/vibe-release-0.7.18
>
> Homepage: http://vibed.org/
> DUB package: http://code.dlang.org/packages/vibe-d
> GitHub: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d

Impressive! :)

Good work, Sönke & contributors

On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 at 19:31:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> This release has a record set of almost 90 additions and fixes. Some of
> them are:
>
>  - Compiles on DMD 2.064 (as well as DMD 2.063.2)
>  - Reworked the WebSocket implementation to not require a particular
>    send/receive order to function properly
>  - Stability and memory consumption of the HTTP client, as well as
>    parts of the HTTP server hav been greatly improved
>  - The render!() function to render Diet templates is considered stable
>    beginning with DMD 2.064, so the more cumbersome renderCompat!() is
>    no longer required
>  - Improved serialization system with allocation-less JSON
>    (de-)serialization among other things
>
> The full list of changes/fixes can be found at
> http://vibed.org/blog/posts/vibe-release-0.7.18
>
> Homepage: http://vibed.org/
> DUB package: http://code.dlang.org/packages/vibe-d
> GitHub: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d

Congratulations on your excellent work.

Congratulations!

Would there be a performance benchmark for V0.7.18?


On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 at 19:31:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> This release has a record set of almost 90 additions and fixes. Some of
> them are:
>
>  - Compiles on DMD 2.064 (as well as DMD 2.063.2)
>  - Reworked the WebSocket implementation to not require a particular
>    send/receive order to function properly
>  - Stability and memory consumption of the HTTP client, as well as
>    parts of the HTTP server hav been greatly improved
>  - The render!() function to render Diet templates is considered stable
>    beginning with DMD 2.064, so the more cumbersome renderCompat!() is
>    no longer required
>  - Improved serialization system with allocation-less JSON
>    (de-)serialization among other things
>
> The full list of changes/fixes can be found at
> http://vibed.org/blog/posts/vibe-release-0.7.18
>
> Homepage: http://vibed.org/
> DUB package: http://code.dlang.org/packages/vibe-d
> GitHub: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d

On 11/26/13 11:31 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> This release has a record set of almost 90 additions and fixes. Some of
> them are:
>
>   - Compiles on DMD 2.064 (as well as DMD 2.063.2)
>   - Reworked the WebSocket implementation to not require a particular
>     send/receive order to function properly
>   - Stability and memory consumption of the HTTP client, as well as
>     parts of the HTTP server hav been greatly improved
>   - The render!() function to render Diet templates is considered stable
>     beginning with DMD 2.064, so the more cumbersome renderCompat!() is
>     no longer required
>   - Improved serialization system with allocation-less JSON
>     (de-)serialization among other things
>
> The full list of changes/fixes can be found at
> http://vibed.org/blog/posts/vibe-release-0.7.18
>
> Homepage: http://vibed.org/
> DUB package: http://code.dlang.org/packages/vibe-d
> GitHub: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d

Terrific, congratulations! I'll post to reddit tomorrow morning.

Andrei

Am 27.11.2013 02:34, schrieb Puming:
> Congratulations!
> 
> Would there be a performance benchmark for V0.7.18?

I ran the bench-http-server/request examples during development to debug a memory leak and it seemed like the performance was worse than a while ago when it was optimized for Dicebot's benchmarks (the performance seems to vary a lot across a benchmark run for some reason). Getting it up to speed again (and keep it there by monitoring performance for each new commit) will be a priority for the coming months.

Hopefully by then the TechEmpower benchmark integration [1] can also be finished, although it may be too late for the next benchmark round (I don't have time to do it currently and probably won't for the next 5 or so months).

[1]: https://github.com/s-ludwig/FrameworkBenchmarks

Thanks for the clarification.

I'll start learning about vibe.d and thinking about using it as a high performance HTTP server.


On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 at 10:47:48 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Am 27.11.2013 02:34, schrieb Puming:
>> Congratulations!
>> 
>> Would there be a performance benchmark for V0.7.18?
>
> I ran the bench-http-server/request examples during development to debug
> a memory leak and it seemed like the performance was worse than a while
> ago when it was optimized for Dicebot's benchmarks (the performance
> seems to vary a lot across a benchmark run for some reason). Getting it
> up to speed again (and keep it there by monitoring performance for each
> new commit) will be a priority for the coming months.
>
> Hopefully by then the TechEmpower benchmark integration [1] can also be
> finished, although it may be too late for the next benchmark round (I
> don't have time to do it currently and probably won't for the next 5 or
> so months).
>
> [1]: https://github.com/s-ludwig/FrameworkBenchmarks