On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 22:02:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> du bist normal oder idiot ?

https://youtu.be/7kjTXMecCrM

Ding dong!

On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 22:08:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 22:02:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> du bist normal oder idiot ?
>
> https://youtu.be/7kjTXMecCrM
>
> Ding dong!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_Award

Si tu crois que tu es un génie, il y a de forte chance que tu sois un gros bouffon.

On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 22:40:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_Award
>
> Si tu crois que tu es un génie, il y a de forte chance que tu sois un gros bouffon.

Jeg hadde faktisk 2001 vinnerne av Turing prisen som forelesere på universitetet og Kristen Nygaard var helt klar på at Dahl var en skarping, og det visste han nok selv også, for det sa alle på instituttet.  Men jeg syntes forelesningen til Ole-Johan Dahl i programverifisering var tørre og alt for fulle av kvantorer... så jeg tror Dahl ville være en dårlig klovn, men han var en glimrende pianist!

Er du sikker på at teorien din stemmer?

Jeg spiller piano.

Sorry about being off-topic, let's get back on topic:

https://youtu.be/MPwLKIXYEPE?t=1m20s

On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 22:02:33 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
> On 01/04/2016 11:08 PM, TheDGuy wrote:
>> On Monday, 4 January 2016 at 21:42:16 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Ups, that was my fault, sry :(
>>
>> But how do i get now the color for each pixel out of the ubyte[]?
>
> It looks like the array has the R, G and B values like this:
>
> [R, G, B, R, G, B, R, G, B, R, G, B, .......]
>
> for every pixel from left to right top to bottom,
> So data[0] gives you the Red value for the pixel at 0,0.
> data[1] the Blue value and data[2] the green value.
> data[3] would then be Red for pixel 1,0.

Thats it, thank you very much!

On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 22:40:22 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 22:08:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 22:02:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>> du bist normal oder idiot ?
>>
>> https://youtu.be/7kjTXMecCrM
>>
>> Ding dong!
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_Award
>
> Si tu crois que tu es un génie, il y a de forte chance que tu sois un gros bouffon.

https://youtu.be/3hrfjSaW8TQ?t=7m54s

At a certain point, I hope we agree about "when good stuff are over the top".

access to pix is easy...

On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 23:26:12 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> access to pix is easy...

This is the learn forum. Maybe one should be able to figure it out without asking, but there is nothing wrong with asking in depth on this forum. The threshold for asking should be low in here. At worst, nobody answers or as it turns out, posts a youtube video...

On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 23:36:16 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 23:26:12 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> access to pix is easy...
>
> This is the learn forum. Maybe one should be able to figure it out without asking, but there is nothing wrong with asking in depth on this forum. The threshold for asking should be low in here. At worst, nobody answers or as it turns out, posts a youtube video...

Until a certain "time" my answers were useful. But I recognize that after this "time" I've managed to turn the topic into something totally delirious because, to be honest I was completly sratched by alcohool. I'm sorry but life is so... I'm mostly serious here but sometimes I draft. Most of the time it's obvious...sorry if you didn't get this...IRL you directly get that the guy is high, on the internet it's not always so obvious.

On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 at 01:41:03 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> Until a certain "time" my answers were useful. But I recognize that after this "time" I've managed to turn the topic into something totally delirious because, to be honest I was completly sratched by alcohool. I'm sorry but life is so...

No worries! The OP got his question answered, an other people got entertained, so it worked out ok :-)