Menu
Learn
Documentation
Language Reference
Library Reference
Command-line Reference
Feature Overview
Articles
Downloads
Packages
Community
Blog
Orgs using D
Twitter
Calendar
Forums
IRC
Wiki
GitHub
Issues
Get involved
Contributors
Foundation
Donate
Sponsors
Resources
Tour
Books
Tutorials
Tools
Editors
IDEs
Visual D
Acknowledgments
D Style
Glossary
Sitemap
Search
Entire Site
Language
Library
Forums
Learn group
This thread
go
Forums
Forum Index
New users
Learn
Community
General
Announce
Improvements
DIP Ideas
DIP Devel.
Ecosystem
GDC
LDC
Debuggers
IDEs
DWT
Development
Internals
Issues
Beta
DMD
Phobos
Druntime
Study
Turkish
Genel
Duyuru
Log in
Settings
Help
Index
»
Learn
»
github: What to do when unittests fail?
»
Post reply
Warning: the post you are replying to is from 14 years ago (May 24, 2011).
Posting to
Learn
in reply to
Jonathan M Davis
Your name:
Your email address (
?
):
Subject:
Message:
On Tuesday, 24 May 2011 at 19:49:03 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On 2011-05-24 12:34, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: >> I think I know what happened. After I've pushed my first >> branch, I immediately created a second branch while I was >> still in the first branch. >> >> I think I should have switched to the main branch and then >> created the second branch. > > When you create a branch, it's a copy of whatever branch you > were on when you created the copy. A branch doesn't have to > come from master. So, if you branched from a branch, then all > of your changes from the first branch would be in the second. > >> Otherwise, these two changes were just sample code fixes which >> get displayed in the docs. I guess you could say they're >> related, and they're really small changes anyway. > > Well, documentation fixes in general can probably be lumped > together - > especially website documentation as opposed to ddoc - at least > as long as > they're not major changes. If you're rewriting whole sections of > documentation, then you might want to do separate pull > requests. But small > documentation fixes would probably be better put in a single > change request to > avoid the administrative overhead of multiple pull requests. > Where you really > get into issues with combining pull requests is when you > combine completed > unrelated bug fixes, and it doesn't sound like you're doing > that. > > - Jonathan M Davis
Enable
Markdown
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the
D Language Foundation