Now that TDPL is well on its way, are there any plans to freeze Phobos in the near future?

(I'm asking because earlier I've proposed some pretty major changes to std.process and std.path, and I'm hoping to get both considered for inclusion before it's too late.)

-Lars

I don't think we need to feature-freeze Phobos. Ideally we'd find some time to work on its known bugs though.

Andrei

On 06/08/2010 09:24 AM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad wrote:
> Now that TDPL is well on its way, are there any plans to freeze Phobos in the near future?
>
> (I'm asking because earlier I've proposed some pretty major changes to std.process and std.path, and I'm hoping to get both considered for inclusion before it's too late.)
>
> -Lars
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos