phobos commit, revision 2145


user: dsimcha

msg:
64-bit fixes for Phobos2.  All of std now passes semantic analysis on Linux with -m64.

http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2145

Would whoever is in charge by any chance be willing to give me write access to druntime so I can make all the necessary 64 fixes to get druntime to pass semantic analysis, too?  I'm interested in doing this even if DMD64 is going to take a while longer, because GDC is rapidly progressing but druntime doesn't compile on GDC64.

On 11/9/2010 7:02 PM, dsource.org wrote:
> phobos commit, revision 2145
>
>
> user: dsimcha
>
> msg:
> 64-bit fixes for Phobos2.  All of std now passes semantic analysis on Linux with -m64.
>
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2145
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>

Done.

On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:04 PM, David Simcha wrote:

> Would whoever is in charge by any chance be willing to give me write access to druntime so I can make all the necessary 64 fixes to get druntime to pass semantic analysis, too?  I'm interested in doing this even if DMD64 is going to take a while longer, because GDC is rapidly progressing but druntime doesn't compile on GDC64.
> 
> On 11/9/2010 7:02 PM, dsource.org wrote:
>> phobos commit, revision 2145
>> 
>> 
>> user: dsimcha
>> 
>> msg:
>> 64-bit fixes for Phobos2.  All of std now passes semantic analysis on Linux with -m64.
>> 
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2145
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Great! How come openrj is still there? I thought I yanked it a long time ago :o(.

Andrei

On 11/9/10 4:02 PM, dsource.org wrote:
> phobos commit, revision 2145
>
>
> user: dsimcha
>
> msg:
> 64-bit fixes for Phobos2.  All of std now passes semantic analysis on Linux with -m64.
>
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2145
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Well, yank it now, then.  I sure as heck don't use it.  The first time I realized it was there was from the discussions on giving it the axe.

On 11/9/2010 7:44 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Great! How come openrj is still there? I thought I yanked it a long time ago :o(.
>
> Andrei
>
> On 11/9/10 4:02 PM, dsource.org wrote:
>> phobos commit, revision 2145
>>
>>
>> user: dsimcha
>>
>> msg:
>> 64-bit fixes for Phobos2.  All of std now passes semantic analysis on
>> Linux with -m64.
>>
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2145
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>

Thanks!

You might want to check out the recent change history for Phobos1. It's all 64 bit fixes, and nearly all applicable to Druntime and Phobos2.

dsource.org wrote:
> phobos commit, revision 2145
>
>
> user: dsimcha
>
> msg:
> 64-bit fixes for Phobos2.  All of std now passes semantic analysis on Linux with -m64.
>
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2145
>
>
>