Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
March 06, 2013 SDLang-D v0.8.2 - SDL lib for D (like JSON/XML, but nicer) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
SDLang-D is D library to read/write SDL (Simple Declarative Language). SDL is a data language like JSON or XML, except it's less verbose and type-aware. Here's an example of SDL: // Websites SDLang-D "https://github.com/Abscissa/SDLang-D" Original_SDL "http://sdl.ikayzo.org/display/SDL/Language+Guide" Changes in this version: - Can now output SDL. (Via 'toSDLString()' funcs.) - Properly handle non-Unix newlines. - Allow '\r' escape sequences. - Make DUB package <https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub> - Fixed Windows buildscript. - Fixed build-docs script so API reference properly excludes private modules. - Rename 'build-unittests' -> 'build-unittest' (for consistency with 'bin/sdlang-unittest'). |
March 06, 2013 Re: SDLang-D v0.8.2 - SDL lib for D (like JSON/XML, but nicer) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nick Sabalausky | Now this is very good. I so badly have wanted the simple data rep that lisp has builtin and this is almost it. XML, in my opinion, is ugly and overly verbose. JASON was better. SDL looks to be just about right.
--
dano
|
March 13, 2013 Re: SDLang-D v0.8.2 - SDL lib for D (like JSON/XML, but nicer) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nick Sabalausky | On Wednesday, 6 March 2013 at 03:57:09 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> SDLang-D is D library to read/write SDL (Simple Declarative Language).
> SDL is a data language like JSON or XML, except it's less verbose and
> type-aware. Here's an example of SDL:
>
> // Websites
> SDLang-D "https://github.com/Abscissa/SDLang-D"
> Original_SDL "http://sdl.ikayzo.org/display/SDL/Language+Guide"
As I understand, SDL doesn't support allman style of curly braces?
|
March 13, 2013 Re: SDLang-D v0.8.2 - SDL lib for D (like JSON/XML, but nicer) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kagamin | On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:35:45 +0100
"Kagamin" <spam@here.lot> wrote:
>
> As I understand, SDL doesn't support allman style of curly braces?
Correct. This is because tags in SDL are newline-terminated.
(It would be possible to allow it as a special-case, but I want to stay compatible SDL's official spec and reference implementation, which doesn't do that.)
You can, however, simulate it with the line-continuation operator:
mytag \
{
subtag
subtag
}
But unlike JavaScript (or early versions of Go, IIRC), if you
do use allman-style by mistake, you're guaranteed to get an error
instead of incorrect behavior:
mytag
{
subtag
subtag
}
SDLangException:
file.sdl(2:1): Error: Anonymous tags must have at least one value.
Come to think of it, I could probably customize the error message for that particular situation to say something more appropriate like "Opening curly braces cannot be on a separate new line".
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation