I want to package them and need to know if the license for the whole repository is and will be Boost? E.g. does someone check new contributions for their license, so we can write a package description once and forget about it?

-- 
Marco

Am Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:29:28 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise <Marco.Leise@gmx.de>:

> I want to package them and need to know if the license for the whole repository is and will be Boost? E.g. does someone check new contributions for their license, so we can write a package description once and forget about it?

Thank you Dicebot - manager of Arch packages - for asking this
before:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/esiqbzfiekzjcmsidsxo@forum.dlang.org#post-kjenbd:241gin:242:40digitalmars.com

Should a global LICENSE file be added to the repo as more and more people start redistributing the source .zip ?

-- 
Marco

On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 15:32:21 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> Am Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:29:28 +0100
> schrieb Marco Leise <Marco.Leise@gmx.de>:
>
>> I want to package them and need to know if the license for the
>> whole repository is and will be Boost? E.g. does someone check
>> new contributions for their license, so we can write a package
>> description once and forget about it?
>
> Thank you Dicebot - manager of Arch packages - for asking this
> before:
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/esiqbzfiekzjcmsidsxo@forum.dlang.org#post-kjenbd:241gin:242:40digitalmars.com
>
> Should a global LICENSE file be added to the repo as more and
> more people start redistributing the source .zip ?

Right now it is inline for every source file as I was not sure if conforming to common license was mandatory for inclusion into "tools" repo.