August 26, 2012
Is the D1 documentation generated from the d-programming-language.org project? I wouldn't have thought so, but I've seen a couple of comments claiming that it was. D1's documentation isn't even _on_ dlang.org, and having to worry about $(V1 ...) and $(V2 ...) is annoying and complicates documenation - not to mention a lot of the documentation can't possibly be for D1, because it covers stuff which isn't even _in_ D1.

Is this something that we need to still be worrying about - at least until the end of the year when support for D1 is officially dropped? Or can we simplify things and just assume that d-programming-language.org is for D2 specifically?

- Jonathan M Davis
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

August 26, 2012
2012/8/26 Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com>:
> Is the D1 documentation generated from the d-programming-language.org project? I wouldn't have thought so, but I've seen a couple of comments claiming that it was. D1's documentation isn't even _on_ dlang.org, and having to worry about $(V1 ...) and $(V2 ...) is annoying and complicates documenation - not to mention a lot of the documentation can't possibly be for D1, because it covers stuff which isn't even _in_ D1.
>
> Is this something that we need to still be worrying about - at least until the end of the year when support for D1 is officially dropped? Or can we simplify things and just assume that d-programming-language.org is for D2 specifically?
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

I join the question:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/153
(however I guess the answer is "partly yes").
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos