Jump to page: 1 2
Thread overview
[dmd-beta] dmd 1.065 and 2.050 beta
Oct 26, 2010
Walter Bright
Oct 26, 2010
Jesse Phillips
Oct 26, 2010
Walter Bright
Oct 26, 2010
Jesse Phillips
Oct 26, 2010
David Simcha
Oct 27, 2010
Fawzi Mohamed
Oct 27, 2010
Stephan Dilly
Oct 27, 2010
Walter Bright
Oct 28, 2010
Stephan Dilly
Oct 29, 2010
Walter Bright
Oct 29, 2010
Stephan Dilly
Oct 29, 2010
Walter Bright
Oct 31, 2010
Fawzi Mohamed
Oct 31, 2010
Walter Bright
Oct 27, 2010
Sönke Ludwig
Oct 27, 2010
David Simcha
Oct 27, 2010
Walter Bright
Oct 27, 2010
David Simcha
Oct 27, 2010
Walter Bright
October 25, 2010
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
October 26, 2010
This bug is still open and fails to compile.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4936

Also what is the proper way to label a regression? I looked an a couple and what I saw was a to say Regression then a dmd version. What I couldn't tell was whether the version should have been where the regression occurred or the version it last worked in.

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>



-- 
Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it. ? - George Bernard Shaw
October 26, 2010
It wasn't marked as fixed in the changelog. I don't know what the problem with it is.

Jesse Phillips wrote:
> This bug is still open and fails to compile.
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4936
>
> Also what is the proper way to label a regression? I looked an a couple and what I saw was a to say Regression then a dmd version. What I couldn't tell was whether the version should have been where the regression occurred or the version it last worked in.
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> 
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>> 
>
>
>
> 
October 26, 2010
"It wasn't marked as fixed in the changelog."

I was mentioning it as it was a regression introduced in 2.049. But it looks like I am using it wrong, due to the introduction of SortedRange. So I guess this should be changed to an enhancement request for a better error.

Sorry for the trouble.

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> It wasn't marked as fixed in the changelog. I don't know what the problem with it is.
>
> Jesse Phillips wrote:
>>
>> This bug is still open and fails to compile.
>>
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4936
>>
>> Also what is the proper way to label a regression? I looked an a couple and what I saw was a to say Regression then a dmd version. What I couldn't tell was whether the version should have been where the regression occurred or the version it last worked in.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmd-beta mailing list
>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>



-- 
Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it. ? - George Bernard Shaw
October 26, 2010
Looks good from here.  dstats, plot2kill, dfl, gtkD, std.parallelism/parallelfuture all compile and work.

On 10/26/2010 1:51 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>

October 27, 2010
On 27-ott-10, at 01:36, David Simcha wrote:

> Looks good from here.  dstats, plot2kill, dfl, gtkD, std.parallelism/ parallelfuture all compile and work.

Here it looks mostly good: tango blip and dchem built and passed the
tests, but I had to remove what looked like two correct "override"
from tango ZipFolder, as the new dmd seems to have a regression in
that case.
Reducing the error seemed a bit of work, and I am busy at the moment,
so I have asked someone else to reduce it
( http://dsource.org/projects/tango/ticket/2012 ).
Hopefully someone will do it soon, and give you a better regression.

Fawzi
>
> On 10/26/2010 1:51 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

October 27, 2010
I am sorry but i found another regression trying to build my codebase with the new beta:


import std.typecons;

alias Tuple!(int,"aa",int,"bb") Foo;

void main()
{
	Foo[] m_array;

	Foo f;

	m_array ~= f;
}


This portion of code used to work with dmd2049. The beta now says:
Error: cannot append type (int,int) to type Tuple!(int,"aa",int,"bb")[]


On 26.10.2010 07:51, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
October 27, 2010
  Just in case this issue was overlooked. I just realized that I also
hit this regression from 2.048->2.049:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4808


Am 26.10.2010 07:51, schrieb Walter Bright:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

October 27, 2010
Is anyone besides me having trouble on Linux with  undefined reference to `_d_throwc' error messages?

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:43 PM, S?nke Ludwig <
ludwig at informatik.uni-luebeck.de> wrote:

>  Just in case this issue was overlooked. I just realized that I also hit
> this regression from 2.048->2.049:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4808
>
>
> Am 26.10.2010 07:51, schrieb Walter Bright:
>
>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20101027/81025d32/attachment-0001.html>
October 27, 2010

David Simcha wrote:
> Is anyone besides me having trouble on Linux with  undefined reference to `_d_throwc' error messages?
>

If that is happening, then you are not linking with the current libphobos.a.

If you are linking with Tango, Tango needs to add that function.
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2