There's some interesting irony in that the only platform that hasn't failed every single build for some time now is the least supported platform, freebsd/64.

I just added comments to the three separate commits that each have introduced consistent failures since they were checked in.  Does anyone bother to check the auto-tester?

Frustrated,
Brad

Hi Brad,

I've suggested this in the past, but I think some kind of email based reporting on the auto-tester to this mailing list would help a lot in highlighting broken builds.

It could even be just a daily report that shows some stats on all the platforms - and could change the subject if an error/broken build is detected.

Thanks,

fil

On 11/06/2011 07:45, Brad Roberts wrote:
> There's some interesting irony in that the only platform that hasn't failed every single build for some time now is the least supported platform, freebsd/64.
>
> I just added comments to the three separate commits that each have introduced consistent failures since they were checked in.  Does anyone bother to check the auto-tester?
>
> Frustrated,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

On 2011-06-10 23:45, Brad Roberts wrote:
> There's some interesting irony in that the only platform that hasn't failed every single build for some time now is the least supported platform, freebsd/64.
> 
> I just added comments to the three separate commits that each have introduced consistent failures since they were checked in.  Does anyone bother to check the auto-tester?

I pay attention but obviously not enough. Though I admit that I've been paying as much attention lately as I have in the past.

- Jonathan M Davis