http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7373 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365 (regression since 2.057) breaks Thrift.

Also, what about the plans stated at Trello? (increase lowest open issue ID to 235, ?)

David


On 1/29/12 10:42 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7199

makes using -inline rather impossible.

Rainer

On 29.01.2012 10:42, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>

While not a regression, I think this needs attention, as it makes final switch mostly useless for enums without int/long base type (which is actually common):

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4517

See also:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7113 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7358 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5713

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

The top three from my pulls.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/639
It is the remain fix of https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/590 .
And https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/407 is a use
case of the feature.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/164
Now we can the issue as a part of hole in const system.
I'd like to fix it with 4251 & 5493 at the same release.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/166
This is quite big, but it is most emergent pull in my owns.

Kenji Hara

2012/1/29 Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>:
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 1/29/2012 4:42 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>

Could we please merge the GC optimizations from druntime?

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/108

We started at 25 regressions, 18 blockers, 45 critical, and 158 major bugs out of 2751 open issues.

Now we have 2541 issues, of which 29 regressions, 15 blockers, and 49 criticals, and 147 majors.

Great job on the bug scrubbing and picking the low-hanging fruit (210!) but unfortunately we haven't significantly reduced the age of the oldest bug, and we have a net increase of regressions and criticals. I'd say we should make significant progress on these three items before considering a beta.


Andrei

On 1/29/12 3:42 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com> wrote:
> We started at 25 regressions, 18 blockers, 45 critical, and 158 major bugs out of 2751 open issues.
>
> Now we have 2541 issues, of which 29 regressions, 15 blockers, and 49 criticals, and 147 majors.
>
> Great job on the bug scrubbing and picking the low-hanging fruit (210!) but unfortunately we haven't significantly reduced the age of the oldest bug, and we have a net increase of regressions and criticals. I'd say we should make significant progress on these three items before considering a beta.
>

With the exception of the regressions, I disagree.

More critical bugs reported does not mean a decrease in quality, just that more people are using D.

Older bugs are usually still open for a reason.  Either they're difficult to solve, or they aren't particularly important.

Either way, I doubt it's worth delaying the beta/release once the regressions are fixed.  There are plenty of improvements that should be available to everybody using D now.

On 1/29/12 10:29 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu<andrei at erdani.com>  wrote:
>> We started at 25 regressions, 18 blockers, 45 critical, and 158 major bugs out of 2751 open issues.
>>
>> Now we have 2541 issues, of which 29 regressions, 15 blockers, and 49 criticals, and 147 majors.
>>
>> Great job on the bug scrubbing and picking the low-hanging fruit (210!) but unfortunately we haven't significantly reduced the age of the oldest bug, and we have a net increase of regressions and criticals. I'd say we should make significant progress on these three items before considering a beta.
>>
>
> With the exception of the regressions, I disagree.
>
> More critical bugs reported does not mean a decrease in quality, just that more people are using D.

Well, it means we don't know until we measure or collect evidence. At this point you are stating a hypothesis.

I just listed everything changed on or after 2011-12-14 (http://goo.gl/QYdpA) with critical/blocker/major and indeed the list is pretty good with 51 items. (Unfortunately I don't know how to list only items that were open before that date.) But having a net decrease or at least some sort of dynamic equilibrium in high-importance bugs would indicate we have control over such.


Andrei