Yay!  This means we can finally make some progress on replacing std.process.  I haven't had much time for D development lately (though I've been lurking on the NG and mailing lists) but I will try to make time for this.

-Lars


On 05/02/12 03:16, Walter Bright wrote:
> Will do.
>
> On 2/3/2012 7:10 AM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
>> Sorry I haven't been active lately, My family and I have had the stomach bug for the last week :(
>>
>> But if you could include those snn.lib changes that you pulled for pipes to work on Windows in the next release, I'd really appreciate it!
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 1/29/2012 2:08 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7373 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375
>

Fixed

On 1/29/2012 2:21 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365 (regression since 2.057) breaks Thrift.
>
>

Fixed.

fixed

On 1/29/2012 2:38 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7199
>
>

On 1/29/2012 3:29 AM, Alex wrote:
> While not a regression, I think this needs attention, as it makes final switch mostly useless for enums without int/long base type (which is actually common):
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4517

Not a problem that should impair the beta.

> See also:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7113 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7358 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5713
>

We've gotten the regressions list whittled down to 11. I know there are a long list of un-pulled pulls, but a large percentage (all?) of the regressions were due to previous pulls. So I'm reluctant to do more pulls that aren't directly addressing a regression for this release.

Any other necessary issues impeding a beta?

On 7 February 2012 20:07, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> We've gotten the regressions list whittled down to 11. I know there are a long list of un-pulled pulls, but a large percentage (all?) of the regressions were due to previous pulls. So I'm reluctant to do more pulls that aren't directly addressing a regression for this release.
>
> Any other necessary issues impeding a beta?


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7394

That one is just a quick re-compile which should be getting done with every release anyway.

-- 
Robert
http://octarineparrot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20120207/73dbc0a2/attachment.html>

There is http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5590
(regression: ICE(e2ir.c): when using .values on enum which is
associative array) and
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7451

Which should both be fixed by rolling back the AA implementation.  I suspect there are others that haven't been found yet related to this.

Out of all the pull requests, this is the one I'd most like to see in this release.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/688

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Robert Clipsham
<robert at octarineparrot.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 7 February 2012 20:07, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>
>> We've gotten the regressions list whittled down to 11. I know there are a long list of un-pulled pulls, but a large percentage (all?) of the regressions were due to previous pulls. So I'm reluctant to do more pulls that aren't directly addressing a regression for this release.
>>
>> Any other necessary issues impeding a beta?
>
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7394
>
> That one is just a quick re-compile which should be getting done with every release anyway.
>
> --
> Robert
> http://octarineparrot.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta