Thread overview
Unix D compiler...
Jan 17, 2002
Cory Spencer
Jan 17, 2002
Walter
Jan 18, 2002
Tim Ottinger
Jan 18, 2002
Pavel Minayev
Jan 18, 2002
Walter
Jan 19, 2002
Mark Meuleman
Jan 19, 2002
Patrick Down
January 17, 2002
I don't suppose anybody has any links to work being done on a Unix D compiler...
January 17, 2002
Not yet!

"Cory Spencer" <cspencer@okcomputer.antiflux.org> wrote in message news:a256ti$2buu$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I don't suppose anybody has any links to work being done on a Unix D compiler...


January 18, 2002
Walter wrote:

> Not yet!
> 
> "Cory Spencer" <cspencer@okcomputer.antiflux.org> wrote in message news:a256ti$2buu$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> I don't suppose anybody has any links to work being done on a Unix D compiler...

This is a shame. I am looking forward to D (Actually, would REALLY look forward of a port of Qt or WxWindows to D -- I'd almost be ready to spend time with that rather than Python) but I don't run Microsoft operating systems anymore. Not unless threatened or held at paycheck-point.

Tim
January 18, 2002
"Tim Ottinger" <tottinge@home.com> wrote in message news:a2858s$18aq$1@digitaldaemon.com...

> This is a shame. I am looking forward to D (Actually, would REALLY look forward of a port of Qt or WxWindows to D -- I'd almost be ready to spend time with that rather than Python) but I don't run Microsoft operating systems anymore. Not unless threatened or held at paycheck-point.

Well, while most people still do (I personally have WinXP, BeOS and
QNX installed), I believe Walter's choice is the best in this situation.


January 18, 2002
"Pavel Minayev" <evilone@omen.ru> wrote in message news:a28v4i$1pjc$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> "Tim Ottinger" <tottinge@home.com> wrote in message news:a2858s$18aq$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> > This is a shame. I am looking forward to D (Actually, would REALLY look forward of a port of Qt or WxWindows to D -- I'd almost be ready to
spend
> > time with that rather than Python) but I don't run Microsoft operating systems anymore. Not unless threatened or held at paycheck-point.
>
> Well, while most people still do (I personally have WinXP, BeOS and
> QNX installed), I believe Walter's choice is the best in this situation.

I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that a "dfront" will be necessary to build. Dfront will translate D to C. That would make D available on any platform with a decent C compiler. Windows will sport a native compiler, but the existence of Dfront will mean users will not be risking their projects on a unique implementation.


January 19, 2002
"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a2a0nc$2q7e$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that a "dfront" will be necessary to build. Dfront will translate D to C. That would make D available on any platform with a decent C compiler. Windows will sport a native compiler,
but
> the existence of Dfront will mean users will not be risking their projects on a unique implementation.

   And new platforms could be very easily bootstrapped, too. That would be a
very good idea indeed.

Salutaciones,
                         JCAB



January 19, 2002
Walter wrote:

> "Pavel Minayev" <evilone@omen.ru> wrote in message news:a28v4i$1pjc$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > "Tim Ottinger" <tottinge@home.com> wrote in message news:a2858s$18aq$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > > This is a shame. I am looking forward to D (Actually, would REALLY look forward of a port of Qt or WxWindows to D -- I'd almost be ready to
> spend
> > > time with that rather than Python) but I don't run Microsoft operating systems anymore. Not unless threatened or held at paycheck-point.
> >
> > Well, while most people still do (I personally have WinXP, BeOS and
> > QNX installed), I believe Walter's choice is the best in this situation.
>
> I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that a "dfront" will be necessary to build. Dfront will translate D to C. That would make D available on any platform with a decent C compiler. Windows will sport a native compiler, but the existence of Dfront will mean users will not be risking their projects on a unique implementation.

Seems very wise to me. Walter, don't hurry.

--
Mark



January 19, 2002
"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a2a0nc$2q7e$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that a "dfront" will be necessary to build. Dfront will translate D to C. That would make D available on any platform with a decent C compiler.

Yes, a dfront would be a great idea.  It would at least make it easy to jump
start D
on other platforms.