Thread overview | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 17, 2002 Unix D compiler... | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I don't suppose anybody has any links to work being done on a Unix D compiler... |
January 17, 2002 Re: Unix D compiler... | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Cory Spencer | Not yet! "Cory Spencer" <cspencer@okcomputer.antiflux.org> wrote in message news:a256ti$2buu$1@digitaldaemon.com... > I don't suppose anybody has any links to work being done on a Unix D compiler... |
January 18, 2002 Re: Unix D compiler... | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Walter wrote:
> Not yet!
>
> "Cory Spencer" <cspencer@okcomputer.antiflux.org> wrote in message news:a256ti$2buu$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> I don't suppose anybody has any links to work being done on a Unix D compiler...
This is a shame. I am looking forward to D (Actually, would REALLY look forward of a port of Qt or WxWindows to D -- I'd almost be ready to spend time with that rather than Python) but I don't run Microsoft operating systems anymore. Not unless threatened or held at paycheck-point.
Tim
|
January 18, 2002 Re: Unix D compiler... | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Tim Ottinger | "Tim Ottinger" <tottinge@home.com> wrote in message news:a2858s$18aq$1@digitaldaemon.com... > This is a shame. I am looking forward to D (Actually, would REALLY look forward of a port of Qt or WxWindows to D -- I'd almost be ready to spend time with that rather than Python) but I don't run Microsoft operating systems anymore. Not unless threatened or held at paycheck-point. Well, while most people still do (I personally have WinXP, BeOS and QNX installed), I believe Walter's choice is the best in this situation. |
January 18, 2002 Re: Unix D compiler... | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pavel Minayev | "Pavel Minayev" <evilone@omen.ru> wrote in message news:a28v4i$1pjc$1@digitaldaemon.com... > "Tim Ottinger" <tottinge@home.com> wrote in message news:a2858s$18aq$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > This is a shame. I am looking forward to D (Actually, would REALLY look forward of a port of Qt or WxWindows to D -- I'd almost be ready to spend > > time with that rather than Python) but I don't run Microsoft operating systems anymore. Not unless threatened or held at paycheck-point. > > Well, while most people still do (I personally have WinXP, BeOS and > QNX installed), I believe Walter's choice is the best in this situation. I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that a "dfront" will be necessary to build. Dfront will translate D to C. That would make D available on any platform with a decent C compiler. Windows will sport a native compiler, but the existence of Dfront will mean users will not be risking their projects on a unique implementation. |
January 19, 2002 Re: Unix D compiler... | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a2a0nc$2q7e$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that a "dfront" will be necessary to build. Dfront will translate D to C. That would make D available on any platform with a decent C compiler. Windows will sport a native compiler, but > the existence of Dfront will mean users will not be risking their projects on a unique implementation. And new platforms could be very easily bootstrapped, too. That would be a very good idea indeed. Salutaciones, JCAB |
January 19, 2002 Re: Unix D compiler... | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Walter wrote:
> "Pavel Minayev" <evilone@omen.ru> wrote in message news:a28v4i$1pjc$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > "Tim Ottinger" <tottinge@home.com> wrote in message news:a2858s$18aq$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > > This is a shame. I am looking forward to D (Actually, would REALLY look forward of a port of Qt or WxWindows to D -- I'd almost be ready to
> spend
> > > time with that rather than Python) but I don't run Microsoft operating systems anymore. Not unless threatened or held at paycheck-point.
> >
> > Well, while most people still do (I personally have WinXP, BeOS and
> > QNX installed), I believe Walter's choice is the best in this situation.
>
> I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that a "dfront" will be necessary to build. Dfront will translate D to C. That would make D available on any platform with a decent C compiler. Windows will sport a native compiler, but the existence of Dfront will mean users will not be risking their projects on a unique implementation.
Seems very wise to me. Walter, don't hurry.
--
Mark
|
January 19, 2002 Re: Unix D compiler... | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:a2a0nc$2q7e$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that a "dfront" will be necessary to build. Dfront will translate D to C. That would make D available on any platform with a decent C compiler. Yes, a dfront would be a great idea. It would at least make it easy to jump start D on other platforms. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation