Thread overview
DIG with newer versions:
Feb 15, 2003
Ilya Minkov
Feb 15, 2003
Burton Radons
Feb 15, 2003
Burton Radons
Feb 15, 2003
Walter
February 15, 2003
I've tried to build DIG 0.0.8 with newer compiler verions:

DMD 0.52 - all examples "disappear" after a few seconds of working; dedit gets an "exception: acess violation" a few seconds after start, and then disappears as well.
DMD 0.53 - none of examples shows a window.
DMD 0.54 - after fxing the source and getting it to compile, the same result as 0.53. :(

All results with win2k.
I have also tried with 0.53 on win98, and got the same result.

Has anyone had more luck?

-i.

February 15, 2003
Ilya Minkov wrote:
> I've tried to build DIG 0.0.8 with newer compiler verions:
> 
> DMD 0.52 - all examples "disappear" after a few seconds of working; dedit gets an "exception: acess violation" a few seconds after start, and then disappears as well.
> DMD 0.53 - none of examples shows a window.
> DMD 0.54 - after fxing the source and getting it to compile, the same result as 0.53. :(

I'll be revisiting it today with the latest compiler.  There will be one change: gridfitting won't happen until the "display" method is sent to whatever top-level control has been changed.

February 15, 2003
Burton Radons wrote:
> Ilya Minkov wrote:
> 
>> I've tried to build DIG 0.0.8 with newer compiler verions:
>>
>> DMD 0.52 - all examples "disappear" after a few seconds of working; dedit gets an "exception: acess violation" a few seconds after start, and then disappears as well.
>> DMD 0.53 - none of examples shows a window.
>> DMD 0.54 - after fxing the source and getting it to compile, the same result as 0.53. :(

Walter, did you also change array append to delete the previous copy if it re-allocates?  What it's failing on is a line I have deleting from an append if it changed the pointer.  I should be removing that crap anyway, and if that change has been made, then kickass.

February 15, 2003
"Burton Radons" <loth@users.sourceforge.net> wrote in message news:b2mdl5$2sb5$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Walter, did you also change array append to delete the previous copy if it re-allocates?  What it's failing on is a line I have deleting from an append if it changed the pointer.  I should be removing that crap anyway, and if that change has been made, then kickass.

No, I didn't change that.