I see that though DMC now has version 8.32.17n, the version number of SC is still 8.29n.  When will version number be increased?  I suppose the current way might confuse some people.

Best regards,

Wu Yongwei

scppn.exe bears the latest version.

This seems to be a regular area of confusion. Any reasons why sc.exe/dnc.exe can't be updated to correspond to the DMC++ version as a whole, Walter?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wu Yongwei" <Wu_member@pathlink.com>
Newsgroups: c++
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: SC version number


> I see that though DMC now has version 8.32.17n, the version number of SC
is
> still 8.29n.  When will version number be increased?  I suppose the
current way
> might confuse some people.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wu Yongwei
>
>

"Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:b3k7md$l2s$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> scppn.exe bears the latest version.
>
> This seems to be a regular area of confusion. Any reasons why
sc.exe/dnc.exe
> can't be updated to correspond to the DMC++ version as a whole, Walter?

Everything that changes increases the testing time and risk of inadvertant breakage. I try not to change things just to change a version number. The correct version number of the whole package is the vXXX file in \dm.