Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 24, 2003 sc vs scppn | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
What difference between sc and scppn ? As I see, scppn only compiler (produce only *obj files), sc is linker+compiler. But when executing sc it prints version not the same as prints scppn. What should I use ? sc or scppn+rcc+link ? |
April 24, 2003 Re: sc vs scppn | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Michail V. Semijonovskich | "Michail V. Semijonovskich" <Michail_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:b88tfk$1rre$1@digitaldaemon.com... > What difference between sc and scppn ? > As I see, scppn only compiler (produce only *obj files), sc is linker+compiler. > But when executing sc it prints version not the same as prints scppn. What should I use ? sc or scppn+rcc+link ? All sc is is a driver program that runs scppn followed by the link. Use sc, as using scppn directly is not supported. |
April 25, 2003 Re: sc vs scppn | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | In article <b89a04$24m6$2@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says... >All sc is is a driver program that runs scppn followed by the link. Use sc, as using scppn directly is not supported. Hmmm... Now I'm using following *.bat file scppn -L<....> -I<...> -WA -DNDEBUG %1 ..... rcc.... link ..... where is %1 etc. - *.bat parameters. But why while executing sc it prints v.8.29n ? |
April 25, 2003 Re: sc vs scppn | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Michail Semijonovskich | "Michail Semijonovskich" <Michail_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:b8acbn$2qgj$1@digitaldaemon.com... > But why while executing sc it prints v.8.29n ? Because I don't update any files unless needed. Patching them just to change the version number just opens the door for mistakes, bugs, etc. To get the correct version number of the system, look at the \dm\vXXX file. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation