Jump to page: 1 2
Thread overview
DMD 0.66 release
Jun 08, 2003
Walter
Jun 09, 2003
Patrick Down
Jun 09, 2003
Walter
Jun 09, 2003
Patrick Down
Jun 09, 2003
Walter
Jun 09, 2003
Patrick Down
Jun 09, 2003
Walter
Jun 09, 2003
Patrick Down
Jun 09, 2003
Walter
Jun 10, 2003
Patrick Down
Jun 10, 2003
Patrick Down
Jun 10, 2003
Walter
BUG: Switch on constant string
Jun 10, 2003
Russ Lewis
Jun 11, 2003
Walter
Jun 11, 2003
Andy Friesen
Jun 11, 2003
Georg Wrede
June 08, 2003
Many minor bugs fixed.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html


June 09, 2003
I've been wanting to ask this for a couple of weeks now, and now I feel it's a good time to do so.

Are there any major changes expected in the language design? Because I'm starting to believe that it could be a good moment to have a final release. What do you all think?

————————————————————————— Carlos Santander


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.488 / Virus Database: 287 - Release Date: 2003-06-05


June 09, 2003
"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1 @digitaldaemon.com:

> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

What happened to the -o option?  It used to
let me set the obj file directory.
June 09, 2003
"Patrick Down" <pat@codemoon.com> wrote in message news:Xns9394EC4C4963patcodemooncom@63.105.9.61...
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1 @digitaldaemon.com:
>
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
> What happened to the -o option?  It used to
> let me set the obj file directory.

Hmm. Nothing should have happened to it!


June 09, 2003
"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc13ci$2k3c$1 @digitaldaemon.com:

> 
> "Patrick Down" <pat@codemoon.com> wrote in message news:Xns9394EC4C4963patcodemooncom@63.105.9.61...
>> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1 @digitaldaemon.com:
>>
>> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>>
>> What happened to the -o option?  It used to
>> let me set the obj file directory.
> 
> Hmm. Nothing should have happened to it!

The "help" listed below has two definitions for it
and "-o filename    name output file" seems to be
the fuctionality now.

Digital Mars D Compiler Beta v0.65
Copyright (c) 1999-2003 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright
www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html
Usage:
  dmd files.d ... { -switch }

  files.d        D source files
  -c             do not link
  -d             allow deprecated features
  -g             add symbolic debug info
  -gt            add trace profiling hooks
  -v             verbose
  -O             optimize
  -oobjdir       write object files to directory objdir
  -o filename    name output file
  -Ipath         where to look for imports
  -Llinkerflag   pass linkerflag to link
  -debug         compile in debug code
  -debug=level   compile in debug code <= level
  -debug=ident   compile in debug code identified by ident
  -inline        do function inlining
  -release       compile release version
  -unittest      compile in unit tests
  -version=level compile in version code >= level
  -version=ident compile in version code identified by ident
June 09, 2003
Are you using the windows or linux version?

"Patrick Down" <pat@codemoon.com> wrote in message news:Xns939555016675patcodemooncom@63.105.9.61...
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc13ci$2k3c$1 @digitaldaemon.com:
>
> >
> > "Patrick Down" <pat@codemoon.com> wrote in message news:Xns9394EC4C4963patcodemooncom@63.105.9.61...
> >> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1 @digitaldaemon.com:
> >>
> >> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> >>
> >> What happened to the -o option?  It used to
> >> let me set the obj file directory.
> >
> > Hmm. Nothing should have happened to it!
>
> The "help" listed below has two definitions for it
> and "-o filename    name output file" seems to be
> the fuctionality now.
>
> Digital Mars D Compiler Beta v0.65
> Copyright (c) 1999-2003 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright
> www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html
> Usage:
>   dmd files.d ... { -switch }
>
>   files.d        D source files
>   -c             do not link
>   -d             allow deprecated features
>   -g             add symbolic debug info
>   -gt            add trace profiling hooks
>   -v             verbose
>   -O             optimize
>   -oobjdir       write object files to directory objdir
>   -o filename    name output file
>   -Ipath         where to look for imports
>   -Llinkerflag   pass linkerflag to link
>   -debug         compile in debug code
>   -debug=level   compile in debug code <= level
>   -debug=ident   compile in debug code identified by ident
>   -inline        do function inlining
>   -release       compile release version
>   -unittest      compile in unit tests
>   -version=level compile in version code >= level
>   -version=ident compile in version code identified by ident


June 09, 2003
In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
>
>Are you using the windows or linux version?
>

Windows


June 09, 2003
"Patrick Down" <Patrick_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bc2bj8$nhv$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
> >
> >Are you using the windows or linux version?
> Windows

Here's how it works. If linking, the -o is assumed to be the executable file name. If not linking, and the filename ends in .obj, it is assumed to be the output .obj name. Otherwise, it is taken to be the output directory.


June 09, 2003
In article <bc2i1i$tu0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
>
>
>"Patrick Down" <Patrick_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bc2bj8$nhv$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
>> >
>> >Are you using the windows or linux version?
>> Windows
>
>Here's how it works. If linking, the -o is assumed to be the executable file name. If not linking, and the filename ends in .obj, it is assumed to be the output .obj name. Otherwise, it is taken to be the output directory.

Ok, I understand.  But it would seem desirable to have a separate flag for the output file and intermediate dicrectory.


June 09, 2003
"Patrick Down" <Patrick_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bc2ml4$12aj$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> In article <bc2i1i$tu0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
> >
> >
> >"Patrick Down" <Patrick_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bc2bj8$nhv$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >> In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
> >> >
> >> >Are you using the windows or linux version?
> >> Windows
> >
> >Here's how it works. If linking, the -o is assumed to be the executable
file
> >name. If not linking, and the filename ends in .obj, it is assumed to be
the
> >output .obj name. Otherwise, it is taken to be the output directory.
>
> Ok, I understand.  But it would seem desirable to have a separate flag for
the
> output file and intermediate dicrectory.

You're right, it is a little confusing.


« First   ‹ Prev
1 2