Jump to page: 1 2 3
Thread overview
DMD 0.67 release
Jun 18, 2003
Walter
Jun 18, 2003
Andrew Edwards
Jun 18, 2003
Walter
Jun 18, 2003
Derek Parnell
Jun 18, 2003
Andrew Edwards
Jun 19, 2003
Walter
Jun 19, 2003
Helmut Leitner
Jun 19, 2003
Walter
Jun 19, 2003
Helmut Leitner
Jun 19, 2003
Walter
Jun 20, 2003
Helmut Leitner
Jun 20, 2003
Walter
Jun 20, 2003
Georg Wrede
Jun 21, 2003
Walter
Jun 20, 2003
Burton Radons
Jun 20, 2003
Walter
Jun 25, 2003
Burton Radons
Jun 25, 2003
Helmut Leitner
Jun 26, 2003
Walter
Jul 05, 2003
Burton Radons
Jul 05, 2003
Burton Radons
Jul 07, 2003
Walter
some bugs - 1 attachment
Jul 06, 2003
Farmer
June 18, 2003
Many minor bugs fixed.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html



June 18, 2003
Walter! I hate to point out the obvious, but the change log has not been updated!

"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bcou88$2qq9$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Many minor bugs fixed.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
>
>


June 18, 2003
Fixed. -Walter

"Andrew Edwards" <edwardsac@spamfreeusa.com> wrote in message news:bcp5ul$kn$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Walter! I hate to point out the obvious, but the change log has not been updated!
>
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bcou88$2qq9$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Many minor bugs fixed.
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> >
> >
> >
>
>


June 18, 2003
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:06:53 -0700 (06/19/03 03:06:53)
, Walter <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Fixed. -Walter
>
> "Andrew Edwards" <edwardsac@spamfreeusa.com> wrote in message
> news:bcp5ul$kn$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> Walter! I hate to point out the obvious, but the change log has not been
>> updated!
>>
>> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message
>> news:bcou88$2qq9$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> > Many minor bugs fixed.
>> >
>> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>> >

Walter,
the changelog hasn't been updated. All it says is "Fixed some bugs"  ;-)

-- 
Derek
June 18, 2003
"Derek Parnell" <derek.parnell@no.spam> wrote in message news:oprqzlsoo959ej19@news.digitalmars.com...
> Walter,
> the changelog hasn't been updated. All it says is "Fixed some bugs"  ;-)
>

Very funny!


June 19, 2003
"Derek Parnell" <derek.parnell@no.spam> wrote in message news:oprqzlsoo959ej19@news.digitalmars.com...
> the changelog hasn't been updated. All it says is "Fixed some bugs"  ;-)

That's all that changed <g>. Seriously, though, each person who reported a bug that was fixed was sent an email confirming the fix, as is my usual practice.


June 19, 2003

Walter wrote:
> 
> "Derek Parnell" <derek.parnell@no.spam> wrote in message news:oprqzlsoo959ej19@news.digitalmars.com...
> > the changelog hasn't been updated. All it says is "Fixed some bugs"  ;-)
> 
> That's all that changed <g>. Seriously, though, each person who reported a bug that was fixed was sent an email confirming the fix, as is my usual practice.

Not exactly true. Never got an e-mail about the float-sort-bug I reported although I saw that it was fixed in the Phobos source.

I would prefer a public bug database.

--
Helmut Leitner    leitner@hls.via.at Graz, Austria   www.hls-software.com
June 19, 2003
"Helmut Leitner" <helmut.leitner@chello.at> wrote in message news:3EF15AD8.23A8B778@chello.at...
> Walter wrote:
> > "Derek Parnell" <derek.parnell@no.spam> wrote in message news:oprqzlsoo959ej19@news.digitalmars.com...
> > > the changelog hasn't been updated. All it says is "Fixed some bugs"
;-)
> > That's all that changed <g>. Seriously, though, each person who reported
a
> > bug that was fixed was sent an email confirming the fix, as is my usual practice.
> Not exactly true. Never got an e-mail about the float-sort-bug I reported although I saw that it was fixed in the Phobos source.

It had been reported several times :-( I apologize for not remembering to email you about it, too.

> I would prefer a public bug database.

So would I, and once upon a time, I did that. Shortly afterwards, a lazy writer wrote a review of it in a magazine that simply published the bug list verbatim and used that as the basis for his negative review. It didn't matter that by the time the article came out, those bugs had long been fixed. So I'm a little reluctant to do that again.

However, most bug reports are posted here in the Digital Mars newsgroups, and remain here.


June 19, 2003

Walter wrote:
> > I would prefer a public bug database.
> 
> So would I, and once upon a time, I did that. Shortly afterwards, a lazy writer wrote a review of it in a magazine that simply published the bug list verbatim and used that as the basis for his negative review. It didn't matter that by the time the article came out, those bugs had long been fixed. So I'm a little reluctant to do that again.

I can understand that.

Perhaps it would make sense to create a semi-public bug database for the people you trust. (or give access to those that have reported at least N+ bugs)

--
Helmut Leitner    leitner@hls.via.at Graz, Austria   www.hls-software.com
June 19, 2003
"Helmut Leitner" <helmut.leitner@chello.at> wrote in message news:3EF1A2BB.3D24BF41@chello.at...
> Perhaps it would make sense to create a semi-public bug database for the people you trust. (or give access to those that have reported at least N+ bugs)

There are the bugs reported on the newsgroups. Anyone can see them if they want to, they just aren't in a format that is easilly cut & pasted into an article <g>.


« First   ‹ Prev
1 2 3