Thread overview
long double
Aug 22, 2003
Steve Hall
Aug 22, 2003
Walter
Aug 23, 2003
Charles Sanders
Aug 23, 2003
Matthew Wilson
Aug 23, 2003
Walter
August 22, 2003
Do you have plans to implement 12 bytes long double in near future?

Steve


August 22, 2003
"Steve Hall" <sthall@lorrexinc.com> wrote in message news:bi5kdn$1gm4$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Do you have plans to implement 12 bytes long double in near future?

No, but we've implemented 10 byte long doubles to match the Intel FPU.


August 23, 2003
we ?

Charles
"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:bi60o2$22oi$2@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Steve Hall" <sthall@lorrexinc.com> wrote in message news:bi5kdn$1gm4$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Do you have plans to implement 12 bytes long double in near future?
>
> No, but we've implemented 10 byte long doubles to match the Intel FPU.
>
>


August 23, 2003
We Walters: Walter-D & Walter-C/C++

Is that right, big W?

"Charles Sanders" <sanders-consulting@comcast.net> wrote in message news:bi6f3a$2odl$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> we ?
>
> Charles
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message
> news:bi60o2$22oi$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > "Steve Hall" <sthall@lorrexinc.com> wrote in message news:bi5kdn$1gm4$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > Do you have plans to implement 12 bytes long double in near future?
> >
> > No, but we've implemented 10 byte long doubles to match the Intel FPU.
> >
> >
>
>


August 23, 2003
Me, myself and I!

"Charles Sanders" <sanders-consulting@comcast.net> wrote in message news:bi6f3a$2odl$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> we ?
>
> Charles
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message
> news:bi60o2$22oi$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > "Steve Hall" <sthall@lorrexinc.com> wrote in message news:bi5kdn$1gm4$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > Do you have plans to implement 12 bytes long double in near future?
> >
> > No, but we've implemented 10 byte long doubles to match the Intel FPU.
> >
> >
>
>