Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 24, 2003 valgrind | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Dear All, valgrind is a Linux memory error detector. When I run dmd -O hello.d; valgrind ./hello , everything is fine. But it doesn't work without -O, because it gives me the unfriendly error message ==21650== Memcheck, a.k.a. Valgrind, a memory error detector for x86-linux. ==21650== Copyright (C) 2002-2003, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward. ==21650== Using valgrind-20030725, a program supervision framework for x86-linux. ==21650== Copyright (C) 2000-2003, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward. ==21650== Estimated CPU clock rate is 804 MHz ==21650== For more details, rerun with: -v ==21650== disInstr: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xC8 0xC 0x0 0x0 This might be an issue for Valgrind, not DMD, but I think it would be important to have DMD and Valgrind working together, so we would be able to track down memory errors much easier. pts |
September 24, 2003 Re: valgrind | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to pts+d | It looks like a bug in valgrind. 0xC8 is the ENTER instruction, and has been around on the PC since the 80286! It works with -O because dmd doesn't generate an ENTER with -O, as ENTER is a bit slow. <pts+d@math.bme.hu> wrote in message news:bkse8p$13od$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Dear All, > > valgrind is a Linux memory error detector. When I run > > dmd -O hello.d; valgrind ./hello > > , everything is fine. But it doesn't work without -O, because it gives me the > unfriendly error message > > ==21650== Memcheck, a.k.a. Valgrind, a memory error detector for x86-linux. > ==21650== Copyright (C) 2002-2003, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward. > ==21650== Using valgrind-20030725, a program supervision framework for > x86-linux. > ==21650== Copyright (C) 2000-2003, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward. > ==21650== Estimated CPU clock rate is 804 MHz > ==21650== For more details, rerun with: -v > ==21650== > disInstr: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xC8 0xC 0x0 0x0 > > This might be an issue for Valgrind, not DMD, but I think it would be important > to have DMD and Valgrind working together, so we would be able to track down > memory errors much easier. > > pts > > |
October 15, 2003 Re: valgrind | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to pts+d | pts+d@math.bme.hu wrote:
> This might be an issue for Valgrind, not DMD, but I think it would be important
> to have DMD and Valgrind working together, so we would be able to track down
> memory errors much easier.
Doesn't garbage collection make it impossible to track down "memory errors" anyway? How do you debug your memory, say in Java? :)
And the need is not that critical as in C and C++.
-eye
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation