A long while ago I created a d.vim syntax file and posted it
on vim.org (http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=379).
It is presently very simple and outdated. Have anyone downloaded
a copy and updated it? I want to update the original source so
it can be included in the vim distribution, but don't want
to duplicate work.

Thanks,
Jason

I've just added the foreach keyword for myself. I think the keywords are there, but some more advanced support would be nice. Automatic indentation of bodies, maybe recognition of function names, for example.

I'm just asking, I find the syntax of the syntax file somewhat cryptic to do it myself.

Lars Ivar Igesund

"Jason Mills" <jmills@cs.mun.ca> wrote in message news:bogn0u$1t8v$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> A long while ago I created a d.vim syntax file and posted it
> on vim.org (http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=379).
> It is presently very simple and outdated. Have anyone downloaded
> a copy and updated it? I want to update the original source so
> it can be included in the vim distribution, but don't want
> to duplicate work.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>

Also, r"bleh" strings aren't fully recognized.

Lars Ivar Igesund

"Lars Ivar Igesund" <larsivi@stud.ntnu.no> wrote in message news:bogt25$260p$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I've just added the foreach keyword for myself. I think the keywords are there, but some more advanced support would be nice. Automatic indentation of bodies, maybe recognition of function names, for example.
>
> I'm just asking, I find the syntax of the syntax file somewhat cryptic to do it myself.
>
> Lars Ivar Igesund
>
> "Jason Mills" <jmills@cs.mun.ca> wrote in message news:bogn0u$1t8v$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > A long while ago I created a d.vim syntax file and posted it
> > on vim.org (http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=379).
> > It is presently very simple and outdated. Have anyone downloaded
> > a copy and updated it? I want to update the original source so
> > it can be included in the vim distribution, but don't want
> > to duplicate work.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jason
> >
>
>

Thanks.

I plan on updating the syntax file soon. I'm waiting a
few more days to see if others have made changes
they would like to see included.


Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> Also, r"bleh" strings aren't fully recognized.
>