On Sunday, 25 June 2023 at 21:30:52 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
>On Sunday, 25 June 2023 at 21:22:49 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
>This use to work.
It was removed a few years ago.
I think so too. I recently had to rework a lot of old code because of it, a real nuisance. Was it thought that null concat was dangerous somehow? A recipe for potential for some kind of mistakes? I presume that reinstating it would be safe enough? If there’s any reason to.
It’s easy to make this mistake:
const x = [
"foo"
"bar",
"baz"
];
x
only has 2 elements, when it looks like it has 3.