Thread overview
Specialisation bug
Dec 29, 2003
Matthew
Jan 01, 2004
Walter
Jan 21, 2004
Matthew
December 29, 2003
Walter

STLSoft has its own char_traits type, and I've recently added some specialisations, on a function level, to it.

Unfortunately DMC++ reports that the in-class function is invalid because its already seen a definition outside the class - the specialisation.

Is this something you're aware of? I'm including file, as I haven't time to prepare an example atm.

Cheers


-- 
Matthew Wilson

STLSoft moderator (http://www.stlsoft.org)
Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
(www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)

"You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much!" -- Uncle Michael

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---




January 01, 2004
No, I'm not aware of it.

"Matthew" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:bsop4l$1g7i$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Walter
>
> STLSoft has its own char_traits type, and I've recently added some specialisations, on a function level, to it.
>
> Unfortunately DMC++ reports that the in-class function is invalid because its already seen a definition outside the class - the specialisation.
>
> Is this something you're aware of? I'm including file, as I haven't time
to
> prepare an example atm.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> --
> Matthew Wilson
>
> STLSoft moderator (http://www.stlsoft.org)
> Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
> (www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)
>
> "You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much!" -- Uncle
Michael
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ---
>
>
>
>


January 21, 2004
I've tried to reproduce this but failed, so best to ignore for the moment. ;)

"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bt27ls$ge$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> No, I'm not aware of it.
>
> "Matthew" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:bsop4l$1g7i$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Walter
> >
> > STLSoft has its own char_traits type, and I've recently added some specialisations, on a function level, to it.
> >
> > Unfortunately DMC++ reports that the in-class function is invalid
because
> > its already seen a definition outside the class - the specialisation.
> >
> > Is this something you're aware of? I'm including file, as I haven't time
> to
> > prepare an example atm.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Wilson
> >
> > STLSoft moderator (http://www.stlsoft.org)
> > Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
> > (www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)
> >
> > "You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much!" -- Uncle
> Michael
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ---
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>