Thread overview | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 17, 2013 [Issue 10099] New: Diagnostic for disable default construction should improve | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10099 Summary: Diagnostic for disable default construction should improve Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2013-05-16 19:05:06 PDT --- ----- struct S { int x; @disable this(); this(int x) { } } void main() { S s; // L12 } ----- > test.d(12): Error: variable test.main.s initializer required for type S This should really be: > test.d(12): Error: struct test.S cannot be default-initialized because it has a default constructor annotated with @disable This would be similar to: ----- struct S { @disable this(this); } void main() { S s; S s2 = s; } ----- > test.d(11): Error: struct test.S is not copyable because it is annotated with @disable -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
May 18, 2013 [Issue 10099] Diagnostic for disabled default construction should improve | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrej Mitrovic | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10099 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> 2013-05-18 08:04:46 PDT --- > test.d(12): Error: struct test.S cannot be default-initialized because it has a default constructor annotated with @disable It seems to me that is a little long message. More shorter is better. With new expression: struct S { @disable this(); } class C { S s; } void main() { auto x = new C(); } test.d(11): Error: default construction is disabled for type C How about using "default construction is disabled for type XXX"? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
May 18, 2013 [Issue 10099] Diagnostic for disabled default construction should improve | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrej Mitrovic | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10099 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2013-05-18 12:17:01 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > test.d(12): Error: struct test.S cannot be default-initialized because it has a default constructor annotated with @disable > > It seems to me that is a little long message. More shorter is better. Yes, bad example. Anything is better than that "initializer required for..". -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
May 18, 2013 [Issue 10099] Diagnostic for disabled default construction should improve | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrej Mitrovic | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10099 --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2013-05-18 12:17:21 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > How about using "default construction is disabled for type XXX"? Perfect. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
September 19, 2013 [Issue 10099] Diagnostic for disabled default construction should improve | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrej Mitrovic | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10099 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |pull AssignedTo|nobody@puremagic.com |andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2013-09-18 18:00:41 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2572 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
September 19, 2013 [Issue 10099] Diagnostic for disabled default construction should improve | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrej Mitrovic | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10099 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzilla@puremagic.com 2013-09-18 21:53:46 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/1ecb4525bfb3b2d76c78e0b1d5c6a822e2411a02 Fixes Issue 10099 - Better diagnostic for a disabled default constructor. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/6380eae1fd53cdcb5a576e7572bc9349d9b95467 Merge pull request #2572 from AndrejMitrovic/Fix10099 Issue 10099 - Better diagnostic for a disabled default constructor. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
September 19, 2013 [Issue 10099] Diagnostic for disabled default construction should improve | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrej Mitrovic | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10099 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation