Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2013 [Issue 10511] New: Unhelpful error messages with a const opDispatch | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10511 Summary: Unhelpful error messages with a const opDispatch Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-06-30 07:52:37 PDT --- Modified from code by David in D.learn. This is wrong code: struct Foo { static Foo opDispatch(string s)() const { return Foo(); } } void main() { Foo f = Foo.bar(); } DMD 2.064alpha gives: test.d(7): Error: no property 'bar' for type 'Foo' test.d(7): Error: Foo is not an expression The error messages don't help much because they don't explain what's the problem. The code able to compile is without "const": struct Foo { static Foo opDispatch(string s)() { return Foo(); } } void main() { Foo f = Foo.bar(); } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 30, 2013 [Issue 10511] Unhelpful error messages with a const opDispatch | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10511 Dicebot <m.strashun@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |m.strashun@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Dicebot <m.strashun@gmail.com> 2013-06-30 08:26:33 PDT --- Why static const methods are allowed in the very first place? Is there a legit use case? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 30, 2013 [Issue 10511] Unhelpful error messages with a const opDispatch | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10511 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-06-30 08:56:06 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why static const methods are allowed in the very first place? Is there a legit use case? I think it's a regression (maybe already reported in Bugzillza), because this code: const void foo() {} void main() {} Used to give: Error: function test.foo without 'this' cannot be const/immutable -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 30, 2013 [Issue 10511] Unhelpful error messages with a const opDispatch | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10511 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2013-06-30 08:58:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I think it's a regression (maybe already reported in Bugzillza), It's Issue 10482 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation