https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982

Sönke Ludwig <sludwig@outerproduct.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|nobody@puremagic.com        |andrei@erdani.com

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982

b2.temp@gmx.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |b2.temp@gmx.com

--- Comment #1 from b2.temp@gmx.com ---
We could instead imagine a system based on introspection (discover data that
should trigger addRange()) and annotations (trust data for for which addRange()
should be called but wont). Depending on the result of the introspection,
GC.addRange() would be called automatically.

See also:

- https://forum.dlang.org/thread/ikcgdppksfvfbdqnsgng@forum.dlang.org - https://forum.dlang.org/thread/iubialncuhahhxsfvbbg@forum.dlang.org - https://forum.dlang.org/post/ficbsdfokvbvslatmomr@forum.dlang.org

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982

--- Comment #2 from Sönke Ludwig <sludwig@outerproduct.org> ---
Yeah, I used to simply `static if (std.traits.hasIndirections!T) GC.addRange(...);` in vibe.d's allocator module. Using annotations instead of controlling this at the call site is an interesting idea, although I can see applications for both approaches.

Using @nogc sounds good, too, although if that approach is taken, I'd propose to define @nogc as a UDA in object.d instead of adding a new special trait for detecting its presence.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982

--- Comment #3 from greenify <greeenify@gmail.com> ---
*** Issue 15790 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982

greenify <greeenify@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |greeenify@gmail.com

--- Comment #4 from greenify <greeenify@gmail.com> ---
(I just closed https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15790 as a duplicate, but it contains a good example that illustrates this issue)

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982

Johannes Pfau <johannespfau@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |johannespfau@gmail.com

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982

ag0aep6g <ag0aep6g@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |safe
                 CC|                            |ag0aep6g@gmail.com

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982

Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|b2.temp@gmx.com             |

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P1                          |P3

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982

--- Comment #5 from dlangBugzillaToGithub <robert.schadek@posteo.de> ---
THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/issues/9696

DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB

--