Thread overview | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 04, 2017 [Issue 17060] betterC std.allocator | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17060 greenify <greeenify@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greeenify@gmail.com -- |
June 19, 2017 [Issue 17060] betterC std.allocator | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17060 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |betterC CC| |bugzilla@digitalmars.com -- |
October 23, 2017 [Issue 17060] betterC std.allocator | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17060 radu.racariu@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |radu.racariu@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from radu.racariu@gmail.com --- +1. Allocators are missing from betterC mode, and they are a very important improvement over C's malloc/free. I think scope(xxx) and struct destructors need to work in betterC mode as a mandatory requirement for allocator redesign. In my opinion they need to be split in 2 : C runtime (core?), and D runtime based - the C runtime based ones should be obviously usable from betterC and ideally the D runtime one should be constructed on the basic blocks provided by the C runtime implementation. Given the experimental nature of the allocatos package this would be a good time to revisit their design and improve their modularity -- |
February 11, 2018 [Issue 17060] betterC std.allocator | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17060 Seb <greensunny12@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greensunny12@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Seb <greensunny12@gmail.com> --- >From the NG: > Mallocator contains/contained (is it fixed?) global `instance` member. So it is/was not betterC. This is key betterC bug because Mallocator is the base building blog for almost all possible BetterC allocators. -- Ilya (https://forum.dlang.org/post/ybibqtybjvqgbzruyegc@forum.dlang.org) @Ilya: I don't think someone has fixed this already :/ -- |
October 11, 2018 [Issue 17060] betterC std.allocator | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17060 --- Comment #3 from Илья Ярошенко <ilyayaroshenko@gmail.com> --- https://github.com/dlang-community/stdx-allocator/pull/12 -- |
December 17, 2022 [Issue 17060] betterC std.allocator | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17060 Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P1 |P3 -- |
December 01 [Issue 17060] betterC std.allocator | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17060 --- Comment #4 from dlangBugzillaToGithub <robert.schadek@posteo.de> --- THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB https://github.com/dlang/phobos/issues/9706 DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB -- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation